Fine writing - here for instance:
"----This is primarily because as a formal legal approach, RoN is still
appealing to or giving central importance to the State, an institution
that inescapably separates “humans” from “nature” and “individual” from
“community”. In this framework, a community that involves
more-than-humans is unthinkable. RoN in such a case emerges as an
interface that enables such a system to only partially recognise the
inseparability of humans and rivers, mountains, and the rest of nature,
and the entanglements amongst them..."
--- though, -- it would be nice to go a little further:
It is not "just" an "interface"...
- rights (property, human etc.) and the often associated need for expert
representation in practice - i.e. exercising a given "right" - is also
the way the state and its cosmovision extends into, names, defines,
price stamps, taxes, and thus controls subjects and objects.
With rights come obligations and those obligations rest on subjugation
and obedience vis-a-vis the monopoly of power.
..............