Here's a few ways to do it:
1) Try the new PTGui beta. It allows one to roughly position
images to approximately where they should be using Align to Grid feature.
Works pretty good.
2) If you are using a pano head, use Fill Yaw at the bottom
of the Image Parameters tab. Set the pitch to what you shot
at and Roll to 0.
3) Use the Panorama Editor to roughly position the sky images.
You can use the flare from the Sun to figure out where the images
should go.
Once they are in about the right place you can optimize and those
images will not move but they will be blended properly.
1) If it's a pano with details that will support CP's in
all images -- just hit the Align button on the first tab.
2) If it's a "big blue bowl" type image with blank skies or
clouds that aren't good for CP's -- I'd use the Align to Grid
first to get the images in approximately the right place -- then
hit the Align button on the first page.
3) After 1) or 2) you still have to optimize to get the images
positioned ready for stitching.
Maybe your problem is that you haven't generated any CP's That still
needs to be done after the Align to Grid.
"should be using Align to Grid feature"
sorry but where and how? I cannot find!
Thank you!
Istvan
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PTGui" group.
> To post to this group, send email to pt...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> ptgui+un...@googlegroups.com
> Please do not add attachments to your posts; instead you may upload files at
> http://groups.google.com/group/ptgui/files
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ptgui
What is your Panorama Settings? Is it Equirectangular with
Field of view 360 horizontal and 180 vertical?
I'm at the limit of my ability to help. Sorry.
Kalain wrote:
> It has been taken by home made motorized pano head.
> Full pano is 81 columns of 11 images. (@450mm at FX equiv)
> As I just want to test new beta feature, I just take 3 columns. (much
> more faster to proceed on my small computer)
>
Did you shoot the panorama around the horizon? I mean is there as much above as below the horizon? Currently it is important to set the proper pitch angle so that after you do Align To Grid the horizon is on the center line of the panorama editor.
Joost
Even with 'roughly arrange images' enabled the optimizer should be able to keep orphaned images together with the panorama.
Please try my previous suggestion (see if the panorama is centered around the horizon); if that does not help I would like to have a copy of the project files - after all it's a beta feature.
Joost
'roughly arrange images' does a fresh start and arranges all images that
have control points from scratch. Then (and this is new in this beta) it
will attempt to arrange the orphaned images in such a way that the
geometry of the panorama is preserved. This only affects the orphaned
images (or orphaned clusters), the alignment of images within a cluster
is not affected.
Joost
Without seeing the project I have not idea what the problem might be, so
can you make your project available?
Joost
Then you would go to Create Panorama to stitch it.
If you can't figure it out it would be helpful if you post the project,
otherwise we would keep theorizing over the many things that might have
gone wrong somewhere in the process (this includes possible bugs in the
beta btw)..
Joost
On Aug 7, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Kalain wrote:
>
>> Assuming you are satisfied with the general appearance of the panorama
>> in the Panorama Editor window:
>
> Yes, general appearance in panorama editor window seems correct.
>
>
>> 1. Select Advanced mode via button on the Project Assistant.
>> 2. Select the Create Panorama tab.
>> 3. Click Set Optimum Size->Maximum Size
>> 4. Choose output file format and select Blended Panorama Only from
>> Layers options.
>> 5. Click Create Panorama.
>
> Ouch!
> Even if general appearance seems ok in Panorama Editor window, this is
> not enough to stich them correctly without any CP!
> Now, if I press "Align image" to generate CP, my 33 images (for this
> example) are not any more positioned with the setting grid. (3 col of
> 11 images)
> Some images are piled onto one image.
You might try working with a completely different panorama and a completely different set of images, and see how that goes.
When images that *you* know to be different are 'piled on top of each other,' this often indicates that PTGui incorrectly thinks that it has found matching points between those images. If you inspect the Control Points tab and check the "piled up" images, I bet you might find some control points paired between images where you can see that actually they should not be.
This can happen when trying to stitch scenes that have repetitive features. The interior of a cathedral or museum... in a forest... in a sports stadium perhaps.
eo
I'm getting a reasonably good panorama with these settings in Apply To Grid:
11 rows of 3 images
Horizontal axis:
Center horizontally: yes
Spacing: spaced by 1.5 degrees
Vertical axis:
Topmost pitch angle: 6 degrees
Spacing: spaced by 2.7 degrees
Remember: for good results you should have the angles as accurately as
possible, and the horizon should be in the center of the panorama.
Joost
On 9-8-2011 7:47, Kalain wrote:
I don't see the screenshots in your mail.
Actually I do notice a bug in the beta now, image 0 doesn't get
positioned correctly. Is worked around by pressing 'Align' again in the
Align to Grid window and then reoptimizing.
But let's suspend this discussion until the next beta is released.
Joost
On 9-8-2011 10:39, Kalain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried with these settings below.
>
> Here is some results :
> With no CP :
>
> With CP : (but all pict do not have some CP and are not stiched.)
>
> Can you post the full workflow (procedure) you did (as I also posted
> previously) ?
>
> Another comment about Grid parameters.
> I understand that user have to give some rough parameters at PTgui
> like nb row / nb pictper row, rough overlap, ...
> Some parameters can't be changed by PtGui (nb row / nb pic per row)
> but some other should be adjusted by the software. (overlap.)
> When you shoot such pano, you can't remenber exactly what was these
> technical settings.
>
> Thanks
>
>
I am having problems stiching large areas of blue sky without any
features such as clouds etc. There is a lack of control points.
How do you overcome this and how do you add control points to an
otherwise featureless zone ?
Regards