Oscar explained how the PreTeXt Principles have to be followed as we
discuss options for the title page.
But let make the same point by directly pushing back against
one particular comment:
"need an override that allows greater flexibility"
That is not the PreTeXt way of thinking. Avoiding such
flexibility is why PreTeXt has been able to keep its promise
to output a variety of formats, all from the same source.
That is also why PreTeXt does so much better than everything else
on accessibility.
Those features are not subject to compromise, which is why we are
so particular about following the Principles.
As often happens, and I believe the Title page discussion is an
example, a use case arises which has not been adequately addressed
by the developers. The solution is not to implement what that one
particular author or publishers thinks they want, but rather the
solution will present itself in a natural way, once enough people
start examining this and other related situations, and understand
the more general context in which this issue occurs.
This is much slower than the LaTeX way of figuring out how to hack
what you want, but this way pays dividends in the long run.
Regards,
David
>
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pretext-support/CAOU9BaVu_EV-3zBVnJZgpOQAbef%2BHXkdea5NgaBvL%2BbjEx%3DNOA%40mail.gmail.com.
>
>