Comments interleaved.
> - Very small thing: any way to remove the new extra search box when the original one is visible? So that two boxes
> aren't visible at one time which might confuse people?
I tried that, and was disturbed when scrolling up made the
lower search box disappear. So, there are positives and
negatives either way. I am happy to hear claims that one
way is better.
> - The extra search box is still visible on my iPad even though the screen is not enough for that to appear.
I just fixed something that was wrong. Below is what you should
see if you refresh.
On a phone, or iPad (depending on font size and orientation) the
search box will be there, just above the bottom navigation
buttons. It will partially cover the bottom line of text.
An alternative (not implemented yet) is to somehow make the search
box an option from the bottom navigation bar. Suggestions welcome
(as are comments that it is okay as-is).
Please ask again if I did not understand your comment.
> - How should I interpret results? What is the difference between the bolded results and the non-bolded results? Could
> such information be provided at the top of the box or should we put some instructions in the book itself?
Two things:
1) For a reference work, or documentation, we will offer a different
results display which moves the most important results to the top.
(Rob did the PreTeXt work for that, and is waiting on me (or a
volunteer!) to do the JavaScript.)
2) Boldness means higher ranking -- in whatever mysterious
way the code does ranking.
Is documentation needed to tell the user that the bold options are
more likely to be what they are looking for?
> - The current box cuts off some (maybe just one?) of the last results. See image attached or go to this book and
> search for "git". This is not a problem on my iPad.
Thanks. I fixed that. Please reload to check.
David