Damoski - How long have you been using MLO?
I have been using it for about 1.5 years. I agree that although MLO is amazingly powerful and intuitive but only in certain ways, it is profoundly confusing and clunky in other ways. Advanced users have called it more of a "productivity platform" than a "productivity application" as such.
This means that you can waste VAST amounts of precious time trying to get things set up the way you want. And personally I came here to save time (!) not build systems... and I want a productivity application that I can use and get on with my life! [grrr]
On the up-side it is worth learning a few MLO hotkeys. The one I use most is:
"Shift/Alt/ [arrow key] " To move stuff up and down tast/project trees.
I also use arrow keys a LOT to expland/collapse tasks.
(note: in both the above cases, up, down, left & right all work - I find this VERY useful.)
I have wasted way too many hours experimenting with completely different ways of using MLO.
I have recently re-structured my entire "Areas of Life" and so far it works quite well.
See my thread: "I am trying to apply GTD to my MLO data..." here:
As you can see I use one folder for each Area of Life, and then have 'actionable status' lists within them.
However I am still not convinced that I have a slick system.
To grasp the nettle, I personally am pretty unhappy with the way MLO handles Area of Life. If you want the truth I think MLO should definitely have another field for "Area of Life". But MLO's interface is already so complicated that (very sadly) I can't see that many people voting for that.
Nonetheless and although I'll probably get shot down for saying this, the MLO authors and the cosy friendly club of old timers that is this (genuinely) wonderful usergroup really need to wake up and smell the coffee. MLO has really tough learning curve and even months later it simply is not as good as it ought to be. Moreover other competing applications will eventually steal MLO's lunch if MLO doesn't raise its game.
Recently MLO has been focusing on developing the apps which is part of the reason Window MLO now looks pretty dated.
Before I moved to MLO I briefly tried about 20 competing systems. Where a lot of rival systems fail, is that they do not freely allow tasks to be come projects and to have as many levels of the task tree as you like. If you like GTD, another weakness of many systems is that they fail to show the NEXT action within each project. And to be able to pull out tasks by starring them to give "focus". And to be able to sort that list. MLO does both very well.
But the structural problem of a lack of decent way of handling "Areas of Life" in MLO is not going away.
One competitor to MLO that might be worth checking out, which DOES have an Areas of Life field is GTDNext.com - have you had a look at it? For better or worse (mostly worse IMHO) it is a web application, and this means it can be a bit clunky. (e.g. I never could work out how to delete multiple tasks at once. Likewise I couldn't work out how to insert a new task in the place I wanted it rather than at the top of the page...)
In short GTDNext has it's own quirks & problems but on the up-side GTDNext does have a dedicated Area of Life field, an it's use of screen space is vastly better than MLO, in my opinion. Anyhow, if you try it please let us know how you get on.
J