Dear Prof. Knowles,
I have found that if I run a RS2-F12/cc-pVQZ-F12 calculation as a separate calculation, I get a different result from if I run it as a sequence with increasing basis set size (e.g., first cc-pVDZ-F12, then cc-pVTZ-F12, and then cc-pVQZ-F12). This appears to be a result of the DF-basis remaining fixed at the basis for the first of the calculations (e.g., CC-PVDZ-F12/MP2FIT for the sequence of basis sets or CC-PVQZ-F12/MP2FIT for the standalone calculation).
In contrast, for a sequence of CCSD(T)-F12 the DF-basis sets change consistently with the basis set and I do not notice similar behavior.
Is there a simple way to make sure the DF-basis is consistent in RS2-F12 regardless of the sequence of calculations?
For reference I repeat below two separate inputs that provide different outputs for the final RS2-F12/cc-pVQZ-F12 result (-55.652754823392 vs -55.653453366172) when running Molpro2023.2 from Sep. 22.
********************
memory,200,m
symmetry, nosym; orient, noorient
angstrom
geomtyp=xyz
geometry={
3
rotational dynamics
N, 0.227645, -0.0217272, -0.0760363
H, 1.02181, 0.204517, 0.562037
H, -4.18478, 0.0973675, 0.494439
}
nosym
basis=cc-pvqz-f12
{rhf;wf,9,1,3}
{multi; closed,3; occ,6; wf,9,1,1;orbprint,3}
rs2-f12,shift=0.2
---
**********
memory,200,m
symmetry, nosym; orient, noorient
angstrom
geomtyp=xyz
geometry={
3
rotational dynamics
N, 0.227645, -0.0217272, -0.0760363
H, 1.02181, 0.204517, 0.562037
H, -4.18478, 0.0973675, 0.494439
}
nosym
basis=cc-pvdz
{rhf;wf,9,1,3}
{multi; closed,3; occ,6; wf,9,1,1;orbprint,3}
basis=cc-pvdz-f12
{multi; closed,3; occ,6; wf,9,1,1;orbprint,3}
rs2-f12,shift=0.2
basis=cc-pvtz-f12
{multi; closed,3; occ,6; wf,9,1,1;orbprint,3}
rs2-f12,shift=0.2
basis=cc-pvqz-f12
{multi; closed,3; occ,6; wf,9,1,1;orbprint,3}
rs2-f12,shift=0.2
---