Combination or WPS and PQR

49 views
Skip to first unread message

Prasad Rode

unread,
Mar 27, 2017, 8:31:30 AM3/27/17
to Materials & Welding
Dear sir,

I have two WPS and PQR separately.
1) SMAW up to 32mm
2) GMAW up to 32mm

But while using combination if these two process, is it necessary for me prepare separate PQR or by combining these two available PQR we can make third WPS.

Regards
Prasad

Kamal Basha

unread,
Mar 28, 2017, 10:14:55 AM3/28/17
to material...@googlegroups.com
Iam not sure..but u can make third wps with this two combination.

--
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/37b8af07-fc52-4070-adb8-6e5c925c8712%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Perumal Govindan

unread,
Mar 28, 2017, 10:43:43 AM3/28/17
to material...@googlegroups.com

Dear Prasad,
You can prepare the WPS with the combination of two PQRs in accordance with the clause QW200.4 (b)- ASME Section IX: 2015 Edition.

No need to prepare the PQRs, again, for more information please refer above clause in ASME Section IX.

Regards
Govindan Perumal

Prasad

M.Sathiya Narayanan

unread,
Mar 29, 2017, 11:17:22 PM3/29/17
to material...@googlegroups.com
we can with in the limitation of all othervariables

Prasad

--
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/materials-welding/37b8af07-fc52-4070-adb8-6e5c925c8712%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Thanks and Regards
M.Sathyanarayanan

Prasad Rode

unread,
Mar 29, 2017, 11:19:22 PM3/29/17
to Materials & Welding
Dear sir,

Thank for reply.
I ave referred the ASME sec is, clause QW200.4 a and b both. It is talking about base metal thickness and metal deposition thickness only.

My query is that, combination of these processes, doesn't affect the base metal properties?
i.e. all other essential variables of both processes does not required to be a compared. (means not required to be same).

Regards
Prasad

Perumal Govindan

unread,
Mar 30, 2017, 1:33:29 AM3/30/17
to material...@googlegroups.com

Dear Prasad

The properties will not affect if the correct consumables used, ensure that the essential variables are met for each welding process.

Regards
Govindan Perumal

--
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/MaterialsWelding-122787?home=&gid=122787&trk=anet_ug_hm
The views expressed/exchnaged in this group are members personel views and meant for educational purposes only, Users must take their own decisions w.r.t. applicable code/standard/contract documents.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Materials & Welding" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to materials-welding+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to materials-welding@googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages