Yu, Xiangliang
unread,Jan 14, 2016, 9:23:06 PM1/14/16Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Sign in to report message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Allen Hubbe, jdm...@kudzu.us, dave....@intel.com, linu...@googlegroups.com, linux-...@vger.kernel.org, SPG_Linux_Kernel
> > From: Xiangliang Yu <
Xiangl...@amd.com>
> >
> > Main changes in V3
> > 1. Remove all power managment related code.
>
> Can you send the third patch with the power management code? I think it is
> important functionality.
Actually, I have answered the question in V2 comments. Now again,
I want to submitted all power management related code if runtime part is ready.
> Furthermore, a review of the power management patch will help with
> getting the flush patch accepted. If the power management patch is
> reviewed and acked as is, the flush patch is probably ok, too, as is. If there
> are changes to power management that are also applicable to the flush patch,
> it would be good to keep it all consistent when adding the functionality to the
> api.
I want to add flush function into ntb_transport.c, but I can't verify the implementation
Because hardware is not ready. So I just define a interface this time for future use.
I notice there are lot of interface that hasn't been used in ntb.h.