[PATCH -next] kunit: fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites()

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Ruan Jinjie

unread,
Aug 1, 2023, 3:37:39 AM8/1/23
to brendan...@linux.dev, davi...@google.com, linux-k...@vger.kernel.org, kuni...@googlegroups.com, ruanj...@huawei.com
Inject fault while probing drm_kunit_helpers.ko, if one of
kunit_next_attr_filter(), kunit_filter_glob_tests() and
kunit_filter_attr_tests() fails, parsed_filters,
parsed_glob.suite_glob/test_glob alloced in
kunit_parse_glob_filter() is leaked.
And the filtered_suite->test_cases alloced in kunit_filter_glob_tests()
or kunit_filter_attr_tests() may also be leaked.

unreferenced object 0xff110001067e4800 (size 1024):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 96, jiffies 4294671796 (age 763.547s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
73 75 69 74 65 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite2..........
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<00000000116e8eba>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4e/0x140
[<00000000e2f9cce9>] kmemdup+0x2c/0x60
[<000000002a36710b>] kunit_filter_suites+0x3e4/0xa50
[<0000000045779fb9>] filter_suites_test+0x1b7/0x440
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000105d79b00 (size 192):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 96, jiffies 4294671796 (age 763.547s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
f0 e1 5a 88 ff ff ff ff 60 59 bb 8a ff ff ff ff ..Z.....`Y......
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
[<000000006afe50bd>] kunit_filter_suites+0x424/0xa50
[<0000000045779fb9>] filter_suites_test+0x1b7/0x440
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff110001067e6000 (size 1024):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 98, jiffies 4294671798 (age 763.545s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
73 75 69 74 65 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite2..........
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<00000000116e8eba>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4e/0x140
[<00000000e2f9cce9>] kmemdup+0x2c/0x60
[<000000002a36710b>] kunit_filter_suites+0x3e4/0xa50
[<00000000f452f130>] filter_suites_test_glob_test+0x1b7/0x660
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000103f3a800 (size 96):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 98, jiffies 4294671798 (age 763.545s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
f0 e1 5a 88 ff ff ff ff 40 39 bb 8a ff ff ff ff ..Z.....@9......
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
[<000000006afe50bd>] kunit_filter_suites+0x424/0xa50
[<00000000f452f130>] filter_suites_test_glob_test+0x1b7/0x660
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000101a72ac0 (size 16):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 104, jiffies 4294671814 (age 763.529s)
hex dump (first 16 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 2a a7 01 01 00 11 ff .........*......
backtrace:
[<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
[<00000000c7b724e7>] kunit_filter_suites+0x108/0xa50
[<00000000bad5427d>] filter_attr_test+0x1e9/0x6a0
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000103caf880 (size 32):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 104, jiffies 4294671814 (age 763.547s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
[<00000000c47b0f75>] kunit_filter_suites+0x189/0xa50
[<00000000bad5427d>] filter_attr_test+0x1e9/0x6a0
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000101a72ae0 (size 16):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 106, jiffies 4294671823 (age 763.538s)
hex dump (first 16 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2b a7 01 01 00 11 ff .........+......
backtrace:
[<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
[<00000000c7b724e7>] kunit_filter_suites+0x108/0xa50
[<0000000096255c51>] filter_attr_empty_test+0x1b0/0x310
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000103caf9c0 (size 32):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 106, jiffies 4294671823 (age 763.538s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
[<00000000c47b0f75>] kunit_filter_suites+0x189/0xa50
[<0000000096255c51>] filter_attr_empty_test+0x1b0/0x310
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000101a72b00 (size 16):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 108, jiffies 4294671832 (age 763.529s)
hex dump (first 16 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
[<00000000c47b0f75>] kunit_filter_suites+0x189/0xa50
[<00000000881258cc>] filter_attr_skip_test+0x148/0x770
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30

Fixes: 5d31f71efcb6 ("kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites")
Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes")
Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanj...@huawei.com>
---
lib/kunit/executor.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c
index 5b5bed1efb93..481901d245d0 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/executor.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set,
for (j = 0; j < filter_count; j++)
parsed_filters[j] = kunit_next_attr_filter(&filters, err);
if (*err)
- return filtered;
+ goto err;
}

for (i = 0; &suite_set->start[i] != suite_set->end; i++) {
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set,
parsed_glob.test_glob);
if (IS_ERR(filtered_suite)) {
*err = PTR_ERR(filtered_suite);
- return filtered;
+ goto err;
}
}
if (filter_count) {
@@ -172,15 +172,18 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set,
parsed_filters[k], filter_action, err);

/* Free previous copy of suite */
- if (k > 0 || filter_glob)
+ if (k > 0 || filter_glob) {
+ kfree(filtered_suite->test_cases);
kfree(filtered_suite);
+ }
+
filtered_suite = new_filtered_suite;

if (*err)
- return filtered;
+ goto err;
if (IS_ERR(filtered_suite)) {
*err = PTR_ERR(filtered_suite);
- return filtered;
+ goto err;
}
if (!filtered_suite)
break;
@@ -194,6 +197,10 @@ static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(const struct suite_set *suite_set,
}
filtered.end = copy;

+err:
+ if (*err)
+ kfree(copy);
+
if (filter_glob) {
kfree(parsed_glob.suite_glob);
kfree(parsed_glob.test_glob);
--
2.34.1

Rae Moar

unread,
Aug 1, 2023, 5:23:06 PM8/1/23
to Ruan Jinjie, brendan...@linux.dev, davi...@google.com, linux-k...@vger.kernel.org, kuni...@googlegroups.com
Hello!

I have tested this and this all looks good to me. Sorry for the delay
in responding to the patches addressing the bugs in filtering. I have
been out of the office for a few days. Thanks for addressing this!

Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rm...@google.com>

-Rae
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "KUnit Development" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kunit-dev+...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kunit-dev/20230801073700.3740895-1-ruanjinjie%40huawei.com.

Ruan Jinjie

unread,
Aug 1, 2023, 10:10:54 PM8/1/23
to Rae Moar, brendan...@linux.dev, davi...@google.com, linux-k...@vger.kernel.org, kuni...@googlegroups.com
I find when open kmemleak and some kunit test config, the above memory
leak info always occur.

David Gow

unread,
Aug 3, 2023, 6:45:03 PM8/3/23
to Ruan Jinjie, brendan...@linux.dev, linux-k...@vger.kernel.org, kuni...@googlegroups.com
Looks good to me. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: David Gow <davi...@google.com>

Cheers,
-- David
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages