To answer Dan's question, I would say there is hope for randonneuring in America - although I wouldn't count on it with the current board, but here is an example of a highly successful Audax country:
Membership Growth
Audax UK was started in 1976 by 16 members of the 24-Hour Fellowship
By the year 2022 the membership had grown to 9,000
In the year now finishing membership has continued to rise.
Naturally, size matters. Britain is tiny compared to America and cyclist are never far away from others, but the main difference is that brevets in the UK can only be organised by cycling clubs in order for the calendar to have the support of a club. Cycling clubs are large and well supported so there are always members who want to ride in groups which translates to Audax. Cities are closer than in the US so brevets organised by one club are ridden by members of other clubs, it is all very homogeneous.
Compare that with RUSA clubs in the US which are run by individuals and where towns and RUSA clubs are hundreds of mile apart. To use an expression, it is a different ball game.
In the early days of Houston Randonneurs, many if not most of the support came from the Dallas club - Lone Star - but to drive nearly 600 miles back and forth a week for bike ride eventually was not sustaining. In addition, quite a number of HR riders were not - and were not required to be - members of RUSA.
So, how to generate enough interest in American randonneuring for it to not only survive but to thrive? Dan, over to you.
KenJ