Hi Steve, John, Ron,
Thanks for getting back to us.
Ron, we have looked at the Radioberry pretty closely, but we were not happy with the software implementation of the interface between the SBC and the FPGA. It uses bit banging, which we would like to avoid as a design solution. As a result, we have decided against it.
Steve, what drew us to the HL2 is the following:
- Completely open hardware, software, gateware, firmware
- Reasonable physical size (we can make it fit a CubeSat with the QRP PA on a separate PCB)
- Relatively simple construction and build (4 layer PCB, no BGA which we can not inspect)
- Clear, open source lineage with tons of community support and extension projects
- Operation on HF by default, and precedence for operation with transverters
- Reasonable cost for average hobbyist
- No ITAR restrictions
These make the HL2 very attractive as a starting point for a modular, open source SDR free of ITAR for space and the amateur satellite service. Most universities, hobbyists can work on it with success, and without legal barriers, afford it, and using the HF as an IF, can build transverters / higher band experiments for it.
We are aware that the HL2 is not optimized for low power consumption, radiation and operation in vacuum. However, we are working on some improvements in these areas (e.g. replace Ethernet interface, add heat sinks to satellite chassis, add redundancy / latch up protection) .
With regards to your suggestion to contact Daniel - thank you. We have been in touch with him since our previous project ORCASat, and he has helped us out with invaluable advice and suggestions many times.
If you are interested, I would be happy to discuss the project with you in more detail. We have just passed the PDR stage, and launch to SSO is expected in 2025 Q4 / 2026 Q1 via the CSA.
73
Levente VA7QF