Stephen wrote:
> horizontal [...] would avoid (very) minor changes in frame geometry.
I'm guessing you'll agree (based on your "very", above) that the geo changes are hardly worth talking about.
By contrast, not making you readjust your brake pads, on a bike with a rim brake,
is a real thing, a practical goal.
Yes, with a typical road dropout (slanted slot), if your pedal is barely clearing the track with the wheel forward and then you move it back, it lowers the BB a little and now you're hitting, oh no! But why not just make the BB high enough for clearance with
the wheel all the way back? Is it so terrible if the pedal then clears the track by a bit
more when you move the wheel forward? Don't even start with the angle changes causing the handling to feel different — there's never been a human who could detect such a small change.
I went to some lengths to make sure the slots were totally horizontal on track bikes, but that was a tradition thing. I was under no illusions that there was anything special about zero deviation from horizontal. It was just what people expected to see.
If someone later drilled the bridge for a brake, then I screwed up, the design is now suboptimal in a noticeable way, even though the rider wouldn't blame me for it. ("Hey, it's a track bike")
Fausto Coppi was mostly known as a road man, but he won a shit ton of track races too. His track bikes had road dropouts, with the typical slanted slot and forward opening, and it didn't seem to slow him down any. I respect that, and wish I'd had the guts
to make track bikes like that. Sensible, but trackies would have stayed away in droves. Seems to me that trackies are even more susceptible to magical thinking than roadies. Especially sprinters, those guys are psycho.
Mark Bulgier
Seattle