So in Joe Rogan's show (like everywhere) there's some noise besides
the signal. Terrence Howard is noise. But I hope you agree with me
that Roger Penrose - a top level scientist who has been praised for
decades despite some unconventional ideas , eventually winning the
Nobel Prize in Physics - is signal.
The noise is the price that one has to pay for the signal. I think
this is a fair deal, and I prefer to hear more noise if I can find
important signals hidden in the noise.
Joe Rogan brings to the attention of the public the ideas of some
scientists who do excellent work (think of our own Ben Goertzel) but
might not reach the public at large otherwise. In these days of
thought policing, cancel "culture" and forced political correctness, I
think the Joe Rogans of the world are very much needed.
Back to Terrence Howard, I didn't watch the episode with him and don't
intend to. I think what he says is BS, and why should I want to waste
my time with BS? But given the choice between Howard AND Penrose, OR
no Howard and no Penrose, I choose the former. And I think if many
people want to listen to a person then, regardless of what you and I
think of that person, that person must be given a platform .