A primordial black hole may have spewed the highest energy neutrino ever found

[John Clark]

A primordial black hole may have spewed the highest energy neutrino ever found

John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis

4e43

[Lawrence Crowell]

This is rather circumstantial.

LC

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "extropolis" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to extropolis+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/extropolis/CAJPayv0LEWjf9NV9gqE6PLGHkBc0LvEZvE_cbgTwPPGEyEzCbA%40mail.gmail.com.

[John Clark]

On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 2:38 PM Lawrence Crowell <goldenfield...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is rather circumstantial.

Whatever caused that super high energy neutrino it must have been something fundamentally new, like an exploding primordial black hole or something else that was equally strange because no known phenomenon could've done it. 

John K Clark

 

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/extropolis/CAAFA0qrv%2Bmvf9eX7prD4Sj4ZFaxrY31YrKamZW_GRwcR2P0axQ%40mail.gmail.com.

[Lawrence Crowell]

On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 2:05 PM John Clark <johnk...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 2:38 PM Lawrence Crowell <goldenfield...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is rather circumstantial.

Whatever caused that super high energy neutrino it must have been something fundamentally new, like an exploding primordial black hole or something else that was equally strange because no known phenomenon could've done it. 

John K Clark

The problem amounts to making an inference from one data point. This neutrino might be from a primordial black hole quantum decaying into a Planck energy burst. but one particle event recorded is not enough to make an inference.

LC

 

 

LC

On Mon, Sep 22, 2025, 12:13 PM John Clark <johnk...@gmail.com> wrote:

A primordial black hole may have spewed the highest energy neutrino ever found

John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis

4e43

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "extropolis" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to extropolis+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/extropolis/CAJPayv0LEWjf9NV9gqE6PLGHkBc0LvEZvE_cbgTwPPGEyEzCbA%40mail.gmail.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "extropolis" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to extropolis+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/extropolis/CAAFA0qrv%2Bmvf9eX7prD4Sj4ZFaxrY31YrKamZW_GRwcR2P0axQ%40mail.gmail.com.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "extropolis" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to extropolis+...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/extropolis/CAJPayv2ko9i-_TiPXawzrc863cFgwR0Dt9n%2BgcDuaf%3Da_nXOmA%40mail.gmail.com.

[John Clark]

On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 5:29 AM Lawrence Crowell <goldenfield...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Whatever caused that super high energy neutrino it must have been something fundamentally new, like an exploding primordial black hole or something else that was equally strange because no known phenomenon could've done it. 

> The problem amounts to making an inference from one data point. This neutrino might be from a primordial black hole quantum decaying into a Planck energy burst. but one particle event recorded is not enough to make an inference.

I agree. But if we find more super high energy neutrinos can you think of another explanation for their occurrence other than the decay and explosion of a small primordial black hole?

John K Clark