> Here is our good buddy Ben Shapiro:
"People think that it was a bunch of economically distressed people from the middle of the country who had been losing their jobs because of globalization with China and so they reacted by voting for Trump. Nobody there was voting for Trump because of his economic policy, nobody knows what his economic policy was.”
It's true I look down my nose at people who believe there is an invisible man in the sky that occasionally talks to them and tells them what to do, as happened when the invisible man in the sky told George W. Bush to start the Iraq War, but it's also true that religious people look down their noses at me because I don't believe in that very same invisible man. And if He did give Bush that advice then God is a lousy advice giver.>"People vote for Trump because he’s a giant pulsating middle finger to a bunch of cultural elite who believe they have a better way to live.That better way to live,involves them looking down their nose at people who attend church regularly"
> "and at people who believe in traditional marriage and people who are pro-life on abortion issues"
> "American exceptionalism and who tend to like the flag".
> On abortion we do have the progress of biological science specifically in Japan and Holland, where biologists are able to fertilize sheep egg and sperm, and grow it from embryo to fetus to lamb to sheep. If the ideological schmucks at Planned Parenthood were savvy instead of ideological, they'd have spent their donations on this, in the US, or for R&D perfection,
> Not to bitch (but I will!),
> remember when you hated on the idea that treating people with better medicines
> Enough young women jailed and or suicided will drive up the intensity of any campaign, barring a war by Putin or Xi. Not good optics for the Republicans,
> Speaking of war, the last war a democrat got into, for fair or foul, was Lyndon Baines Johnson in 1964, and he was the peace candidate against Barry the warmonger Goldwater.
> Speaking of Loonies, there is no such thing. There is only accurate or inaccurate.
> The ad hominem attacks work with your guys,
> You aren't refuting my fix, which is not my fix, but the work of biologists.
> My thing on Bush is If and only IF he let Bin Laden go to Iran
> Could be disinformation
> You, are being Naive about the Communist Party China. Really. Meaning that not only white people can do evil things
> Also, Fauch and Gates ain't ok guys
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/1091925205.1043971.1658768208943%40mail.yahoo.com.
> Fauch, claimed that Moderna & Pfizer prevent the transfer of Covid and this is not true.
> Gates is in business with a retried PLA general who bought land in the US.
> I have to search for information for articles to help form my opinion.
> My thing on Bush is If and only IF he let Bin Laden go to Iran
> Could be disinformation
> You, are being Naive about the Communist Party China. Really. Meaning that not only white people can do evil things
> Also, Fauch and Gates ain't ok guys
> I would say the first thing I noticed in your reply was that you didn't address the two links that I sent regarding the idea of actual biologists developing artificial wombs
> I would challenge that 29 times number, because in recent articles no medical journal or medical scientist is now claiming this.
> The Communist Party are the greatest killers the world has ever known
> You have just decided in the face of evidence that this is impossible
Translating you lament into American English I, the guy, who supplied the links are:1. A work around against abortion seems to be fetal transfer to artificial wombs for incubation. The work has been successful on sheep in research labs in Japan & The Netherlands. I am in favor of abortion and contraceptives. But I see artificial wombs as the next step forward. Its call medical progress. Reduce the butchery and raise kids.
On Monday, July 25, 2022 at 2:46:32 PM UTC-7 meeke...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/25/2022 2:19 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:
Translating you lament into American English I, the guy, who supplied the links are:1. A work around against abortion seems to be fetal transfer to artificial wombs for incubation. The work has been successful on sheep in research labs in Japan & The Netherlands. I am in favor of abortion and contraceptives. But I see artificial wombs as the next step forward. Its call medical progress. Reduce the butchery and raise kids.
It's that last part that is the bigger problem. When a ten-year old is pregnant by a rapist, who's going to raise the kid. When a woman with three young children and a full time job gets pregnant, who's going to raise the kid.
Brent
I can only see artificial wombs solving a very limited niche problem for:1) women who had a hysterectomy but have functioning ovaries or frozen away ova/embryos. This will really kill the in vitro fertilization business in the pro-life states, because they will insist that every frozen embryo will need to be incubated to full term. In fact, if you believe that life starts at conception then IVF clinics kill a lot of "babies". Each IVF cycle harvests about 15 eggs, 2/3 of which are fertilized of which only 1 to 4 are implanted. The rest of the embryos are usually eventually destroyed.
2) Women in early pregnancy who have cancer or some other condition for whom pregnancy might be hazardous. But transferring a live fetus in this way will be a major undertaking with considerable risk to the fetus. In the current legal environment if the fetus dies in the process of transferring to the artificial womb the doctor will probably be charged with murder.
The problem is not technology it is public policy and politics. And no number of new technologies will solve that problem.
Dirk
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/36da3aee-3c8b-4bda-89cd-99622585a3d7n%40googlegroups.com.
The problem is not technology it is public policy and politics. And no number of new technologies will solve that problem.Dirk