Yeah I found it interesting that the founder of the proud boys a non-white guy was ID or outed as an FBI informant in certain drug cases some years back so I was always cautious of this so-called group because they fight they fought the antifa people but for what reason? I had wondered if one or more than them were FBI informants and according to one attorney general or former assistant attorney general as I recall the dude in question was indeed an FBI informant.
Back to the original topic the paper by the Royal society asserts, and the good physicists who posted this study, holds that people who hold views different from what I would term the Democratic socialist norm, that is so prevalent nowadays and academia, is indeed mentally defective.
That's somehow their ability to observe the world and process information is in some fashion disenhanced. Like calling those who the Royal society disagrees with, retarded. That was my takeaway from the Royal society article provided.
It also reminds me of the 1939 Nazi psychiatrist process called teagarden 4 or teer garden for that was utilized to get rid of the retarded, depressed people, political opponents. It seems to me like this methodology is now again being proposed if so we'll get to see who is the weekend victim, and who in actuality is not?
Yeah I found it interesting that the founder of the proud boys a non-white guy was ID or outed as an FBI informant in certain drug cases some years back so I was always cautious of this so-called group because they fight they fought the antifa people but for what reason? I had wondered if one or more than them were FBI informants and according to one attorney general or former assistant attorney general as I recall the dude in question was indeed an FBI informant.
Back to the original topic the paper by the Royal society asserts, and the good physicists who posted this study, holds that people who hold views different from what I would term the Democratic socialist norm, that is so prevalent nowadays and academia, is indeed mentally defective.
That's somehow their ability to observe the world and process information is in some fashion disenhanced. Like calling those who the Royal society disagrees with, retarded. That was my takeaway from the Royal society article provided.
It also reminds me of the 1939 Nazi psychiatrist process called teagarden 4 or teer garden for that was utilized to get rid of the retarded, depressed people, political opponents. It seems to me like this methodology is now again being proposed if so we'll get to see who is the weekend victim, and who in actuality is not?
On Friday, February 26, 2021 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <everyth...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
On 2/26/2021 1:49 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote:
>
> We don't live in a free country, but a land that is increasingly
> menaced by an oligarchy funding democratic socialist (soviet) causes.
>
> academia, is indeed mentally defective.
.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 8:32 AM Lawrence Crowell <goldenfield...@gmail.com> wrote:> academia, is indeed mentally defective.
I would say that if madness is a disease that causes ones to distrust the vocalizations of the dem establishment, sure, fine. The once democratic party looks now to be an increasingly poor imitation of the kind of setup in the People's Republic of China. Team dem loves censorship,they want to control what people say, and it all gets funded (The CP) by oligarchs. I will just reiterate, that if the dems screw up the economy post-Covid, there will be a ferocious public reaction.
On Monday, March 8, 2021 at 10:05:25 AM UTC-6 johnk...@gmail.com wrote:On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 8:32 AM Lawrence Crowell <goldenfield...@gmail.com> wrote:> academia, is indeed mentally defective.I did not write that. I think in the replies and so forth with nested statements that somehow became implied as mine.
> I would say that if madness is a disease that causes ones to distrust the vocalizations of the dem establishment, sure, fine. The once democratic party looks now to be an increasingly poor imitation of the kind of setup in the People's Republic of China.
> Team dem loves censorship,
> Based of recent democrat rulings, let's use natural gas prices and supply (fracking) as a real-world test of how this impacts the economy? Nat gas turbines supply about 38% of the electrical supply to the US. Much has been in the service of replacing coal fired plants, and thus, shuttering those. Now what happens to price and supplies for gas turbines when supplies decrease because of policy-induced shortages?
> If we experience rolling blackouts and brownouts, the rabble, even dem rabble will turn and blame their 'leadership,'
> what's more important, saving the earth or feeding your family?
.
On 9 Mar 2021, at 18:33, John Clark <johnk...@gmail.com> wrote:On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 8:47 PM spudboy100 via Everything List <everyth...@googlegroups.com> wrote:> I would say that if madness is a disease that causes ones to distrust the vocalizations of the dem establishment, sure, fine. The once democratic party looks now to be an increasingly poor imitation of the kind of setup in the People's Republic of China.The Republican party is far more sympathetic to totalitarian governments than the Democrats are, just look at how Trump literally "fell in love" with North Korean murderer and torturer Kim Jong-un.
> Team dem loves censorship,That's why team Democrat wants to "open up the libel laws" and make them federal so that a sitting president could sue a newspaper if the newspaper says something negative about the president that he doesn't like… Oh wait… that's not team Democrat that's team Republic.> Based of recent democrat rulings, let's use natural gas prices and supply (fracking) as a real-world test of how this impacts the economy? Nat gas turbines supply about 38% of the electrical supply to the US. Much has been in the service of replacing coal fired plants, and thus, shuttering those. Now what happens to price and supplies for gas turbines when supplies decrease because of policy-induced shortages?I admit most environmentalists are not serious people and the solutions they propose are not realistic, but Joe Biden is not one of those environmental nutcases, he does not propose fracking be eliminated, and the reason coal burning plants have been largely shut down is not because of environmental issues but simply because coal plants are more expensive to operate than natural gas plants now that natural gas has become so cheap thanks to fracking. And Biden is the most pro-nuclear power president we've had in 50 years, a generous part of his $2 trillion climate change plan is earmarked for nuclear power, particularly small modular reactors, and he frequently mentions the fact that nuclear power is a zero carbon technology, and it has the best safety record of any energy source.> If we experience rolling blackouts and brownouts, the rabble, even dem rabble will turn and blame their 'leadership,'If Biden screws up the economy then he should be blamed, but so far at least I see no evidence that he is doing that.> what's more important, saving the earth or feeding your family?That's a very odd question. Is the important thing for you that when the Earth comes to an end and your family faces oblivion at least they will do so with a full stomach?.John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv1pd5xtWa1KG7hG-Bo7-V6Uo0v6US_Cf0cd%2Be%2BgihYaQQ%40mail.gmail.com.