Re: Ignorance Interpretation of Superposition

[John Clark]

On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 12:26 PM Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Brent alleged it is "exactly wrong". I'd appreciate an argument why that's the case. TY, AG

I don't see why you expect Brent to answer your question when he must know you will not read it if it's longer than 10 or 12 words; after all you never read my answer to the same question, it just had too many words. 

 John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis

ash

[Alan Grayson]

On Saturday, October 12, 2024 at 11:58:53 AM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:

On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 12:26 PM Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Brent alleged it is "exactly wrong". I'd appreciate an argument why that's the case. TY, AG

I don't see why you expect Brent to answer your question when he must know you will not read it if it's longer than 10 or 12 words; after all you never read my answer to the same question, it just had too many words. 

You continue to be an incorrigible ASSHOLE who supports a theory which makes ZERO sense! And your reply does NOT answer the same exact question! I  AM reading it, and I will read any reply Brent might offer. AG

ash

[Alan Grayson]

I should write, incorrigible and incurable. AG 

ash

[Alan Grayson]

I noticed that yesterday Brent made a very subtle and substantive critique of your concept of realism, and so far you have NOT answered that critique. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. AG 

ash