Dark Matter: How Physics Overlooks Chemistry?

[Philip Benjamin]

Everything List everyth...@googlegroups.com   general...@googlegroups.com

[Philip Benjamin]  

        Theoretical physicists (see notes below) posit: “An invisible civilization could be living right under your nose”. They seem to be gratified by using the term “interacting dark matter” and proceed no further. They seem to forget that no visible civilization is possible without the visible phenomenon of an interacting visible matter, which is ordinarily and unapologetically known as “chemistry” in any visible Civilization today. To be more precise, extraordinary bio dark-matter chemistry must be more rational and normal than ordinary bio light-matter chemistry, since according to these theorists: “there is six times more dark matter in the universe than ordinary matter.”

         What they are referring to is the unknown astrophysical dark-matter. The known astrophysical light-matter is largely ions of the most abundant elements of the universe-- H and He, while the biospherical light-matter consists of the 92+ elements of the Periodic Table. From symmetrical considerations, there may be a class of biospherical dark-matter which is what these theorists hypothesize as “small fraction of dark matter” with the further remark that “it is definitely a worthwhile theory to explore”. 

             Any “ worthwhile theory to explore” here is bio dark-matter chemistry of bio dark-matter atoms. Chemistry means chemical bonds which are spin-governed particle configurations of duets and octets. It is conceivable that the different flavors of neutrinos may behave as electrons and (protons + neutrons). The masses of ν 1 and ν 2 are known to be close to one another (verisimilar to the close masses of p and n, while ν 3 weighs much less than the other two, such that the ratios of the masses of the neutrino flavors correspond to the ratios of the masses of e, p, n. Or. the dark matter atoms may consist of monopoles (N & S) and axions, all of negligible mass relative to electron mass, but with the same ratios as e, p, n. 

Empirical Evidences:

       1 . Unidentified “Additional Mass of Life” for a living organism in a hermitically sealed system, which disappears at death as reported by Amrit S. Sorli, Scientific Research Centre BISTRA, Ptuj, Slovenia, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary; doi=10.1.1.218.573;  https://core.ac.uk/display/21767122. 2012, Journal of Theoretics Vol.4-2).       

      2 . Unidentified Source of biophotons.

      Dark and light chemical bonds have similar properties, interact with each other, rotate, vibrate, oscillate, have reciprocal motion, stretch, contract, have resonance structures, associate, dissociate, bend and break. These cause weak changes in energetics of the light-matter chemical bonds, and result in emission of weak photons. They indeed exist and are  known as biophotons. Attributing the origin of that emission to DNA is flawed, since the standardized rate of emission varies across the taxa by an order of magnitude though the DNA structures are the same.  The sudden burst of biophotons at the moment of death of plant and animal cells results from the breaking of the coupling forces. OBE/NDE phenomena depend on the extent of  “bond-dissociation”. 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282154962_Bio_dark-Matter_Chemistry_Implications https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_spirit_our_energy_Is_spirit_dark_energy

http://biodarkmatter.webs.com/index.htm                                                                                                    

https://www.prlog.org/12085722-dr-philip-benjamin-explains-the-bio-chemistry-of-our-inner-selves-in-his-latest-book.html  “Spiritual Body or Physical Spirit”

Corollary:

    At the moment of conception both light and dark twins in resonance are cocreated. Resonance is rudimentary recognition. That may  be the beginning of self-awareness.  

Philip Benjamin  

                           CC. Harvard Center of Fundamental Laws of Nature & High Energy Theory.  

Notes:

            https://nautil.us/issue/48/chaos/does-dark-matter-harbor-life Does Dark Matter Harbor Life? An invisible civilization could be living right under your nose. BY LISA RANDALL      

               https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/06/delving-into-dark-matter/   

“Though dark matter is otherwise believed to be non-interacting, theoretical physicists Lisa Randall, the Frank B. Baird Jr. Professor of Science, and Matthew Reece, assistant professor of physics, earlier this year [2014] suggested that a hypothetical type of dark matter could form a disk of material that runs through the center of the galaxy”…. “If you were to look at our world and assume there was only one type of particle, you’d be pretty wrong,” Randall said. “I think it’s definitely a worthwhile theory to explore, because even if this is only a small fraction of dark matter, there is six times more dark matter in the universe than ordinary matter. We care a lot about ordinary matter, and that’s precisely because it has interactions. So if there is a small portion of dark matter that has those interactions, that may be what we should pay attention to, perhaps even more so than other dark matter.”.

 

 

 

                            

[Lawrence Crowell]

Total crap.

LC

[Tomas Pales]

If dark matter interacts only weakly, does it mean that it is more likely to be in quantum superpositions than ordinary matter?

                

[John Clark]

On Sat, Sep 25, 2021 at 4:57 PM Tomas Pales <litew...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If dark matter interacts only weakly, does it mean that it is more likely to be in quantum superpositions than ordinary matter?

There is a theory that dark matter can interact with itself because dark matter may be its on antiparticle, if true then when 2 dark matter particles combine they would annihilate each other and produce a burst of gamma rays.  There is a slight excess of gamma rays coming from the center of the galaxy and some think dark matter may be responsible for it.

John K Clark    See what's on my new list at  Extropolis

nn2

 

[Brent Meeker]

If a particle is isolated, no interactions, then it's in a pure state.  A pure state is not a superposition in some coordinate basis, but it's a superposition in other bases.  So being in a superposition is relative the basis you use to write the state.  Being weakly interacting would I think make dark matter particles (if dm is particles) more isolated and therefore less likely to be entangled and not in a superposition.

Brent

On 9/25/2021 1:57 PM, Tomas Pales wrote:

If dark matter interacts only weakly, does it mean that it is more likely to be in quantum superpositions than ordinary matter?

                

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/188d817c-8d6f-48dc-9d82-02c41d2c747en%40googlegroups.com.

[Tomas Pales]

On Sunday, September 26, 2021 at 12:43:06 AM UTC+2 Brent wrote:

If a particle is isolated, no interactions, then it's in a pure state.  A pure state is not a superposition in some coordinate basis, but it's a superposition in other bases.  So being in a superposition is relative the basis you use to write the state.  Being weakly interacting would I think make dark matter particles (if dm is particles) more isolated and therefore less likely to be entangled and not in a superposition.

I mean that the particle's properties like position and momentum are in a superposition of values instead of having single values - the particle's wave function is not collapsed. There is almost no interaction and so almost no decoherence. Does that also mean that the wave functions of the particles don't interfere much? Could such particles be in a quantum entanglement? (the "spooky action at a distance")

 

[Brent Meeker]

On 9/26/2021 11:22 AM, Tomas Pales wrote:

On Sunday, September 26, 2021 at 12:43:06 AM UTC+2 Brent wrote:

If a particle is isolated, no interactions, then it's in a pure state.  A pure state is not a superposition in some coordinate basis, but it's a superposition in other bases.  So being in a superposition is relative the basis you use to write the state.  Being weakly interacting would I think make dark matter particles (if dm is particles) more isolated and therefore less likely to be entangled and not in a superposition.

I mean that the particle's properties like position and momentum are in a superposition of values instead of having single values - the particle's wave function is not collapsed.

"Being in a superposition" is like going North-East is a superposition of going North and going East.  In QM if you want to measure the direction your instrument defines the eigenvalues, so if it's an North or East instrument it collapses North-East to either North,  with probability 0.5, or East with probability 0.5.  It's only a "superposition" because we don't have an instrument that has North-East as an eigenvalue.

There is almost no interaction and so almost no decoherence. Does that also mean that the wave functions of the particles don't interfere much? Could such particles be in a quantum entanglement? (the "spooky action at a distance")

In general, i.e. outside controlled laboratory conditions, particles interact a lot.  Air molecules bump into other air molecules, IR photons get emitted and absorbed,...  All those interactions imply entanglement.  But we need to be clear that although it is common to talk about particles being entangled, what is actually entangled, i.e. caused to be correlated, are properties of particles, i.e. things you can measure about them. So often an experiment is done by entangling the angular momentum of two particles…but leaving their linear momentum unentangled, or their energy unentangled. And it’s even possible to entangle different properties of the particles, e.g. the linear momentum of one with the angular momentum of another…although this would take some ingenuity to do deliberately in the lab.

Second, a property of a particle has only so much to entangle. So two particles can be 100% entangled in some property. If you measure it on one particle you know exactly what is on the other. But three particles can’t be 100% entangled. If you measure one you only 50% knowledge of the other two. So what happens “in the universe” is that particles interact with many other particles, so they are a little bit entangled with each of the others…which means for all practical purposes they are not entangled at all. You would have to measure billions of other particles to get complete information about the entangled property of this one particle…or you could just measure it.

Brent

[Tomas Pales]

On Monday, September 27, 2021 at 1:05:01 AM UTC+2 Brent wrote:

In general, i.e. outside controlled laboratory conditions, particles interact a lot.  Air molecules bump into other air molecules, IR photons get emitted and absorbed,...  All those interactions imply entanglement.

So if dark matter particles didn't interact with each other at all, there could be no quantum entanglement between them and thus no "spooky action at a distance"? Could their wave functions interfere with each other?

It seems to me there are two kinds of interaction between particles: (1) causal interaction via forces and (2) acausal interaction via interference of the particles' wave functions and instantaneous "spooky action at a distance". If there is no causal interaction between dark matter particles does it mean there is no acausal interaction between them either?

[Philip Benjamin]

Philip Benjamin  The Logical Fallacy of Summary dismissal of a discussion is a narcissist trait.   

Adapted and edited from:  http://seekfind.net/Logical_Fallacy_of_Cutting_Off_Discussion__Summary_Dismissal.html  

“Logical Fallacy of Cutting Off Discussion / Summary Dismissal” Authored or compiled by Petros B. Scientia. Petros blogs on RealReality.org.

“Summary dismissal is one of the many smokescreens that are used to cover the fact that the reasoning is based on one of the three fallacies of Agrippa's trilemma. Whenever a logical fallacy is committed, the fallacy has its roots in Agrippa's trilemma. All human thought is based on one of three unhappy possibilities. These three possibilities are infinite regression, circular reasoning, or axiomatic thinking. This problem is known as Agrippa's trilemma. Science is also limited to the pragmatic because of the weakness on human reasoning, which is known as Agrippa's trilemma. 

The Logical Fallacy of Cutting Off Discussion / Summary Dismissal occurs when a summary dismissal by any means is used to simply cut off the discussion rather than addressing the issues. A summary dismissal is often accompanied by a declaration of victory with false bravado.

Summary dismissal is usually not used knowing that it is a tactic. It is an act of self-righteous frustration when facts are beginning to expose inconsistencies in one's own worldview/fake reality…….”

 

Subject: RE: [Consciousness-Online] FW: Dark Matter: How Physics Overlooks Chemistry? From: "Philip Benjamin" <medin...@hotmail.com>

 Compositional fallacy or The Part-to-Whole fallacy occurs when it is assumed that if part of a thing is true, then all of it is true”. Half-truths are more misleading than full lies. The universe we experience is made of particles at quantum levels. That does not mean an aggregate of particles is a quantum aggregate” except perhaps at molecular levels (not cellular). Everything is not “quantum”. A flower for example is an aggregate of cells which is more than the sum of its parts at molecular or atomic quantum levels.

Genetic information has awhole lot to do in all these. Different plant roots take in different chemicals or elements depending on genetic information, though all genetic materials are made of e, p and n. Genetic information (not the structures) in humans are not the same as in other life forms. How is the source of and difference in rates of emission (by an order of magnitude) across the taxa accounted for?

A dar-matter universe is no exception. The use of the term “universe” is in question here, not dark-matter per se.

Philip Benjamin  

[Philip Benjamin]

 everyth...@googlegroups.com   Subject: FW: FW: [Consciousness-Online] FW: Dark Matter: How Physics Overlooks Chemistry?

Philip Benjamin.

No, that was a reply to everything list. I thought a copy to GT was relevant. Dark-matter per se and dark-matter universe are two entirely different things. One is under the purview of physics  and the other of chemistry. No chemistry, no universe! Those with physics or computer science background apply their world views to dark-matter universe, instead of basic chemistry which either they despise or are incorrigibly ignorant. Narcissism is a sign of un-awakened consciousness (UC) which is characteristic of Marxist-Socialist-Fascist-anarchist-Progressive pagans—for example those who support the burning and looting of Marxist governed cities in the once Puritan America i.e. Awakened or individual Augustinian consciousness (AC) on a massive scale.

Philip Benjamin

 

…..-Evans' via Consciousness-Online <general...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 10:51 AM
To: general...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: FW: [Consciousness-Online] FW: Dark Matter: How Physics Overlooks Chemistry?

Philip
I assume you are treating my comment - which in fact was Ralph Frost's extremely simple but astute observation - as summary dismissal.

A dark-matter universe is no exception. The use of the term “universe” is in question here, not dark-matter per se.

Philip Benjamin

--
 .

[Philip Benjamin]

 

 

From: Philip Benjamin  Wednesday, October 27, 2021 9:11 AM general...@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: FW: FW: [Consciousness-Online] FW: Dark Matter: How Physics Overlooks Chemistry?

 

[Philip Benjamin].

        WAMP-the-Ingrate (from KG to the University) is more concerned with transgenderism, XX = XY and the perversely fraudulent data of the entomologist Kinsey than with dark-matter sciences.  It is conceivable that a freshman science student in a foreign university can NOW accomplish more than the WAMP (Western Acade-Media Pagan(ism)—the stealing beneficiaries of the Augustinian Trust.   

       Worldviews are just that—NOT SCIENCE. It was a colossal blunder for that brilliant Bohr to bring in his world view through the backdoor as science. Many a pagan scientist in the West with un-awakend consciousness do that. They at the same time find fault with ecclesiastical establishment for defending Geocentricism, without any THINKING of the fact that it was the “science” of those days (for all recorded history) including that of the brilliant astronomer and mathematician Ptolemy. However, the calculations resulted in the same results, be it geo or helio centric. That is not what Bohr did—in his CopenPagan Misinterpretation! An AS IF behavior needs only an AS IF logic. Not one Puritan scientist ( Michel Faraday was perhaps the last) resorted to the Bohr misfeasance.    

Philip Benjamin .

[Lawrence Crowell]

I truly hope nobody is taking any of this seriously.

LC

[Brent Meeker]

If you didn't post in response it would have resided unseen in my Junk bin.  I'll bet your email prog has a Junk bin too.

Brent

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0ddf5458-4970-45ce-9770-14b3e093a706n%40googlegroups.com.

[spudb...@aol.com]

Just say you will use the knowledge you possess to make life better. Nobody else on the mailing list can really claim this, now can they LC?

The Paganism statement reminds me of the Jewish Physics by Phillipe Lenard & Johannes Stark. Or a bit closer to the aryan theory espoused by Ousepensky and the Thule Society of Bavaria. Militant transgenderism is one thing, but if somebody kicks our knowledge a notch higher, whomever they are, I ain't going to spit in there faces, that is for sure! The light switch works or it don't? Meaning whatever it predicts must work

Bohr's interpretation is mild compared to what has been done by Everett, DeWitt & Wheeler. Although this view is Split (bwah hah hah etc...yawn)

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit

https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0ddf5458-4970-45ce-9770-14b3e093a706n%40googlegroups.com

.

[Lawrence Crowell]

Ben frames foggy headed ideas of physics with religious nonsense. It is just pure rubbish is all. I also am not a partisan of any quantum interpretation either. I see these as unprovable or indemonstrable hypotheses about quantum physics. 

LC