On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:21:49 -0700
J Decker <
d3c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If code can be run, it can be reverse engineered; just a matter of how much
> work one wants to put into it.
> If the code was compressed, and encrypted, then there'd still be a small
> bit code that has the decrypt, which can be extracted to get the rest, etc.
> Remote checking is a better option; requiring a bit of external code that
> encodes the license in a varying way, for submission to the server, which
> might reply with some small code which enables it to actually function.
> Of course - the really diligent would still just capture the reply and
> bundle it all up statically.
>
> It's just a matter of how much time you want to make them spend... but much
> like a lock that can be opened can be picked, code that runs can be 'run'
> virtually, using just pen and paper.
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:43 PM Mehaboob kk <
mehab...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Is there any technique to protect the WASM code from reverse engineering?
> > I have a licensed software which need to be protected. I am worried that
> > the reverse engineered code can be modified to bypass the license and
> > compile it back again
> >
> > Any inputs please
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mehaboob
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "emscripten-discuss" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to
emscripten-disc...@googlegroups.com.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> >
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/d9c09212-cad8-40e1-ba4c-88979f8437a2n%40googlegroups.com
minute. In total.