Correlational Tractography: Number of streamline is the magnitude of relevance?

25 views
Skip to first unread message

高橋航来

unread,
Jun 25, 2025, 10:01:55 AM6/25/25
to DSI Studio
Dear Frank and all, 

You may sometimes want to perform correlational tractography analysis for individual items of the same battery or same group of metrics.

In our case, we performed CT for 6 items of the rhythm ability battery to see if 
①there is relationships between white matter microstructure and rhythm ability
and
②there is common and distinct white matter tracts correlated with each item.

Regarding ②, we found that the same group of tracts were correlated for almost all groups, but the number of streamlines were very different (e.g., 50000 in one item and 50 in another).
In this case, is the number of streamlines a evidence of the magnitude of the relevance between certain white matter tracts and metrics of interest?

I appreciate your continuous support for the community.

Sincerely,

Koki

Frank Yeh

unread,
Jun 25, 2025, 10:06:07 AM6/25/25
to kokitakah...@keio.jp, DSI Studio
I would use 'volume' to quantify the 'magnitude of the relevance' here.
Although 'volume' is mostly correlated with 'tract counts', sometimes
they may not correlate perfectly.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DSI Studio" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dsi-studio+...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dsi-studio/874285d9-b35e-4f20-aaa9-511caf91806bn%40googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages