$240 fluorescence microscope

525 views
Skip to first unread message

Eric Ma

unread,
Aug 10, 2010, 1:49:32 AM8/10/10
to diy...@googlegroups.com
Hey everybody,

I'm not sure if this has already been posted, but PLoS One has got a really cool article on a $240 fluorescence microscope!


Cheers,
Eric
---------------------------------------------------------------
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Do you really need to print it?

Cory Tobin

unread,
Aug 10, 2010, 2:29:50 PM8/10/10
to diy...@googlegroups.com
> I'm not sure if this has already been posted, but PLoS One has got a really
> cool article on a $240 fluorescence microscope!
> http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011890


Unfortunately they didn't include instructions on how to build it :(
Although, in the "Competing Interests" section it says that the
authors have applied for a patent on the technology. So maybe the
information is out there somewhere. Anyone good at digging up patent
applications?


-Cory

Eric Young

unread,
Aug 10, 2010, 2:38:10 PM8/10/10
to diy...@googlegroups.com
Don't really have time to read that article myself, but if you can
give me the name(s) of the person or company applying for the patent I
can probably find it this evening or maybe at lunchtime today.

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
> To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
>
>

Simon Quellen Field

unread,
Aug 10, 2010, 3:43:49 PM8/10/10
to diy...@googlegroups.com
Just looking at the photos of the device it is obvious how to build it.

The differences between this and an epi-fluorescence microscope are
that a blue LED is placed where the bright field light source is normally
placed, instead of using an objective with a beam splitter as both the
condenser and the objective.

This means you can use cheap objectives, but the sample has to be transparent
to blue light, and it is lit from below instead of above.

There is a filter to block the blue light and only let the longer wavelengths
through.

I'll be covering a similar design in my book on microscopy, but using a 405 nanometer
laser as the light source (from a BluRay disk player). My design can be retrofit into
an existing microscope, or can be part of the homemade microscope I will be describing.

You can follow the progress on the book as I write it at "http://micro.sci-toys.com".
The printed-on-paper version will come out in 2011.


On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Cory Tobin <cory....@gmail.com> wrote:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.




--
Get a free science project every week! "http://scitoys.com/newsletter.html"


JonathanCline

unread,
Aug 12, 2010, 1:56:50 AM8/12/10
to DIYbio, jcline
On Aug 10, 11:29 am, Cory Tobin <cory.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm not sure if this has already been posted, but PLoS One has got a really
> > cool article on a $240 fluorescence microscope!
> >http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011890
>
> Unfortunately they didn't include instructions on how to build it :(
> Although, in the "Competing Interests" section it says that the
> authors have applied for a patent on the technology.

Additional important point is the funding source: " Support was
provided through a grant [...] through the Undergraduate Science
Education Program." If undergrads built it, there's not that much
novel intellectual property involved. Also, they used a $800 digital
camera (Canon G9; quoted from buy.com ) to take the pictures-- from
the device stated as costing under $300 to build. They could have
chosen a cheaper make of digital camera, to be more impressive.


## Jonathan Cline
## jcl...@ieee.org
## Mobile: +1-805-617-0223
########################

Mega [Andreas Stuermer]

unread,
Dec 6, 2013, 5:46:21 AM12/6/13
to diy...@googlegroups.com
Reviving this old thread :D

Does anyone have an idea where to get a cheap flurescence microscope? The "cheapest" one on ebay is ~900$.

I could hack my own cheap microscope but a) possibility to destroy it, b) possibility to burn my eyes with the uv light...

Nathan McCorkle

unread,
Dec 6, 2013, 5:57:52 AM12/6/13
to diybio
Take blue LED gel illuminator and place it under microscope with
sample in place of a gel?
> --
> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> diybio+un...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at
> https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
> Learn more at www.diybio.org
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "DIYbio" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
>
> To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/b4cbe169-b1f4-4fb1-9d65-6b5ddac0cae8%40googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
-Nathan

Andreas Stuermer

unread,
Dec 6, 2013, 7:10:40 AM12/6/13
to diy...@googlegroups.com
Nice idea ;)

Will get my home gel illuminator soon anyway.


You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/diybio/F-wkkJ18JOk/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.

Sebastian Cocioba

unread,
Dec 6, 2013, 8:00:37 AM12/6/13
to diybio
Electron Microscopy Sciences sells an adapter for dissection microscopes to become UV. Its just a flex-light with UV LED. I'm sure you could easily hack some things together to make a similar product. Have you thought of using the 3d printable microscope and add a blue LED like previously suggested? I wonder if visible UV can damage eyes...the 390nm spectral ballpark range.

Sebastian S. Cocioba
CEO & Founder
New York Botanics, LLC
Plant Biotech R&D

From: Andreas Stuermer
Sent: 12/6/2013 7:10 AM
To: diy...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [DIYbio] Re: $240 fluorescence microscope

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/CAGHxOnQpDLwhhXN-heNpyzyySQoKT%3D0D4ThH8GNu9sbANFbRCQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Andreas Stuermer

unread,
Dec 6, 2013, 8:43:56 AM12/6/13
to diy...@googlegroups.com
> I wonder if visible UV can damage eyes...the 390nm spectral ballpark range.

Probably yes, but not as much as higher energy UV. Wear sunglases when looking into the microscope?


Mac Cowell

unread,
Dec 6, 2013, 11:19:54 AM12/6/13
to diy...@googlegroups.com

You could start with this affordable 2000x microscope: http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B004QEFO1Q


The TU DELFT iGEM 2013 team prototyped a diy "typhoon" fluorescence scanning microscope they called zephyr. The XY stage was superfluous but I thought the optics they figured out was really interesting. The got a well-matched high-power LED and dicroic mirror and emission filter and mounted them in a simple integrated light path. Perhaps those components could be combined with the camera mount of the above microscope.


http://2013.igem.org/Team:TU-Delft/Zephyr


Mac


--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe@

--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/CAGHxOnTLzZwYejbLJmz49TFcr1BmA%2Bdew2GkS%2BnbmP1ygCpv4Q%40mail.gmail.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
Sent from my Rotary Phone

Brian Degger

unread,
Dec 6, 2013, 12:16:42 PM12/6/13
to diy...@googlegroups.com
the costs of the optics was still fairly high, think $600-$1000 (havent done the adding up)from the bom on http://2013.igem.org/Team:TU-Delft/Zephyr_How
520nm Bandpass Filter, 36nm Bandpass, OD6 Blocking, 25mm Dia, Stock No. #67-030Emission filter 1link 1
472nm Bandpass Filter, 30nm Bandpass, OD6 Blocking, 25mm Dia, Stock No. #67-027Excitation filter 1link 2
495nm Dichroic Filter, 25.2 x 35.6mm, Stock No. #67-079Dichroic mirror 1link 3
4X DIN Plan Commercial Grade Objective, Stock No. #67-706Objective 1link 4
10X DIN Wide Field Microscope Eyepiece, Stock No. #36-130Eyepiece 1link 5



For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
----------------------------------------
Brian Degger
twitter: @drbrian

----------------------------------------

Mac Cowell

unread,
Dec 6, 2013, 12:35:19 PM12/6/13
to diy...@googlegroups.com
Well, they thought a commercial typhoon laser scanner was like $100k+, so $1-2k BOM made sense to them. Just depends on how DIY you want to get.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
----------------------------------------
Brian Degger
twitter: @drbrian

----------------------------------------

--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/CACc%3DpR%2Bq05UE-ihYa4Xcq%3D4sY6Xb1es9g8d69NJ2GzcY_kS8yQ%40mail.gmail.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Mega [Andreas Stuermer]

unread,
Dec 8, 2013, 10:24:32 AM12/8/13
to diy...@googlegroups.com
> Just depends on how DIY you want to get.

Always the same trade-off between diy efforts (and risk of destryoing the original hardware) and money^^

Matthew Harbowy

unread,
Dec 8, 2013, 2:08:24 PM12/8/13
to diy...@googlegroups.com
I think there are a lot of lessons that can be taken from how Amscope upgrades their 200$ microscope to a 2500$ fluorescent microscope, without destroying the original hardware or ones eyesight


First: use a webcam on a trinocular mount.

Second: use an orange shield. 

The ability to use colored glass filters in the light path is the major safety and usability upgrade, and I bet that orange filters or cover slips above the sample could solve this even better. A little care and attention to your own hardware's details and you should get great results. You can also buy the upgraded fluorescent objectives: http://www.microscopenet.com/fluor-objective-fluorescent-microscopes-p-439.html?gclid=CLuf_52pobsCFW0V7AoddBcA1w

Matt
--
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diy...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio.

Simon Quellen Field

unread,
Dec 8, 2013, 8:38:23 PM12/8/13
to diybio
You can't put a filter between the coverslip and the objective. Microscope objectives are make for particular cover slip thicknesses (that thickness is usually printed under the magnification number on the objective). The thickness of the coverslip changes the optics, so the objectives are made to accomodate that.

I have never heard of UV blocking cover slips. But it is easy to put filters in the light path above the objective, such as at the bottom of the eyepiece, or in front of the camera. I often use my SLR without a lens, so the only thing between the camera sensor and the subject is the objective lens. That leaves a lot of room for putting in filters (and you get a much better camera than the ones they ship with microscopes).


-----
Get a free science project every week! "http://scitoys.com/newsletter.html"

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages