IIRC, protein absorption is measured at 280nm? Make sure that's not in a
significant absorption band for your GFP fluorophore, or the fluorophore
might throw off your readings.
That is, I don't think the 280 readings generally assume that the
protein content of the solution has an unusually high absorbance at that
wavelength, but a GFP variant might! :)
On 17/01/14 03:35, kenny kostenbader wrote:
> Nathan, remind me to come back to you when I have a scientific
> heavy-lifting problem on my hands :) that's quite the solution!
>
> Avery, I'd be able to get a value for mg/ml of protein from an absorbance
> reading.
>
> I was hoping to find a set of pictures that compare jars of GFP with
> differing concentrations, something like that. When I get to my own
> samples, I'd be happy to perform some dilutions and post pictures
> somewhere. Someone out there will find that interesting :)
>
>
> Kenny
>
>
> On Thursday, January 16, 2014 7:50:08 PM UTC-5, Avery wrote:
>>
>> or you could get some GFP and serially dilute it until you cant see it.
>>
>> Filters help block the light that causes the excitement, but also make the
>> overall image dimmer.
>>
>> How do you measure GFPs/volume?
>>
>> --A
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Nathan McCorkle <
nmz...@gmail.com<javascript:>
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> you might try finding the dosage (watts of light per area... i.e.
>>> w/cm^2) that photobleaching of GFP occurs at, then from there
>>> determine the maximum fluorescence (watts of light per area, or # of
>>> photons), then find the minimum detection limit for the eye for that
>>> wavelength (watts/area or photons).
>>>
>>> With that you should be able to determine how much light a single GFP
>>> gives off at full brightness, then you can divide the minimum
>>> sensitivity of the eye by that number to get # of GFPs needed. You
>>> could then modify the equations with lower input power, in case you
>>> don't have a super-bright UV light that is capable of photo-bleaching.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:26 PM, kenny kostenbader
>>> <
kenst...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering how much GFP (in aqueous solution) would be required to
>>> glow
>>>> bright enough to see with the naked eye? Or does it depend more on the
>>>> intensity/color of the excitation lighting?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Kenny
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups
>>>> DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to
>>>
diy...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>
diybio+un...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. For more options, visit
>>>> email to
diybio+un...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to
diy...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>>> .
>>>
diy...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. To unsubscribe from this group,
>>> send email to
diybio+un...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. For more
>>> options, visit this group at
>>>
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
>>> Learn more at
www.diybio.org
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "DIYbio" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to
diybio+un...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>>> To post to this group, send email to
diy...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>>> .
>>>
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/diybio/CA%2B82U9L3w%3DtFYKsV26y4gdg04Te6fiVXFW0U%3Dz8fZR_9NBS-MQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>> .