Cool, would have loved to see that!
It's a bit irrelevant to my needs, right now however. The basics of how
illumina works are widely known, it's the practicalities of how *well*
it works in nichey use-cases like mine that matter.
I've been told that it's unusual to multiplex more than 96 samples, and
that a few hundred (say 300) is really pushing the machine to its
limits. I'd like to hear if there's a credible dissenting view here,
because I thought Illumina could easily multiplex hundreds or thousand
of samples with reasonable coverage?