Pro99-lnextlevel link
Michael Stadler
After many hours of testing this link, which included the following.
Pro99 side
1. Had nextlevel groove up to nextlevel results wasn't good, allthough signal was in the 50's and I tried many different frequencies.
2. 25dbi mimo Dish to nextlevel same results as test one also played around with freq
In both these test pulling data from pro99 towards nextlevel yielded good results but the other way around was real bad
Nextlevel side
1. Groove to pro99
2. Hn card to pro99
3. N-card
All of these gave the same bad result. Please note the Sq- nlvl which is working perfect was turned to pro99 tested and failed to give good results. The is actually a big building in the way and could be that the building is interfering with results.
This leads me to believe that for some reason pro99-nextlevel is not working and leaves us looking for another link into bothasig. I have spoken to Mark and he said we can test a link between nextlevel and cheaptrick to bring more needed bandwith into bothasig.
Myself and nextlevel turned his grid thay was pointing pro99 towards cheaptrick signal at the moment to the sector is -54. This means that bothasig has two open links doing nothing if the cheaptrick-nextlevel links works.
Abrie how do you and Andre feel about a long link to ruffy in seapoint he already has a dish waiting to connect and if it works he'll buy another dish to connect to Venus.
Then lastly lurker is sitting with a groove on the top of his pole thay could be pointed to Janssen for a test. Janssen has a awesomely good link to nextlevel.
Let me know how you guys feel about this and if we can make it happen.
Regards ogon
Brendan Hide
Re Janssen-Lurker, Sensei and I have discussed it. He's keen. I'm keen. So far the only reason it hasn't happened yet is timing and being less-than-ideally organised. xD
A Sqr-Nlvl link sounds good to me. Given your report, the bad link is probably terrain-related and not the equipment, so there isn't really much of a choice in terms of what's needed to sort it out.
Sent from my Galaxy Note 3
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CTWUG Bothasig" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ctwug-bothasi...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to ctwug-b...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ctwug-bothasig/faa0a267-6599-4142-8e2f-bcfba6f8161e%40googlegroups.com.
Cliffton van Tonder
Im down with whatever it takes to get me faster than 100kbps. Using my adsl for series again because its so slow. Let me know if there is anything i can do. Willing to chip into the project again.
Prins, Keith
I am available this Saturday from 11 to turn the groove.
If we are doing work on the pole, I also want to move 1 meter to the left to the other wall. This will allow us to loosen the brackets and lower the pole all the way to the ground, keeping it vertical, so that we can reach the radios on the top by standing on the roof. As opposed to currently removing the pole from the brackets completely and lowering the pole horizontal each time we work on it.
Last time there was an issue, we swopped the SXT on the Lurker-pro99 link to another one that someone dropped off. Does anyone remember who that belongs to? I don’t. Can it be left on the pole, or was it just a loan.
I have another SXT which is a private non wug link that has died. I would like to use my spare SXT (if it is working) to fix that link, but that depends on the owner of the current SXT serving the Lurker-pro99 link.
So
1) Who owns the SXT on the lurker pole connecting to Pro99. Can it stay there?
2) Who is available to assist moving the pole and aligning the groove to Janssen. I hope the cables are long enough………
Keith Prins
Business Application Specialist
Computacenter (SA)
Enabling Users
Parc Du Cap
Building 1
Mispel Road, Bellville, 7535,
Cape Town, South Africa
To post to this group, send email to ctwug-b...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ctwug-bothasig/CAKL%3DHutLBOZoHA0WgvGPsZcQVmp4M9HRp5p%2Bi_MT%3DWhgEsn%3D-Q%40mail.gmail.com.
**********************************************************************
COMPUTACENTER PLC is registered in England and Wales with the registered number 03110569. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW
COMPUTACENTER (UK) Limited is registered in England and Wales with the registered number 01584718. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW
COMPUTACENTER (Mid-Market) Limited is registered in England and Wales with the registered number 3434654. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW
COMPUTACENTER (FMS) Limited is registered in England and Wales with the registered number 3798091. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW
The contents of this email are intended for the named addressee only.
It contains information which may be confidential and which may also be privileged.
Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive mail for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else.
If you receive it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it.
Computacenter information is available from: http://www.computacenter.com
**********************************************************************
Mark
Hi Keith
That belongs to Bruce (Darkwing). I will try and make the 11h00 cheers Mark
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 11588 (20150507) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 11588 (20150507) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 11589 (20150507) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CTWUG Bothasig" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ctwug-bothasi...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to ctwug-b...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ctwug-bothasig/20150507-094632.10irqspfu-24oi%40mailcc11.
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 11589 (20150507) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
Cliffton van Tonder
If anybody has spare old sxt's to sell let me know. I want 3. Also have a neighbour in van arkel who wants to get onto lurker.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ctwug-bothasig/001f01d088a3%246df47b10%2449dd7130%24%40co.za.
Bruce Pawley
My 2 cents.....
Pro99-NextLevel is not working because of the monstrosity on the corner of Mydrecht Street which is probably obstructing LOS.
Lurker to Janssen, great idea, pity we can't make it dual pol - although probably doesn't need to be too fast if we have Cheaptrick Nextlevel.
Cheaptrick to NextLevel - another great idea - Mark, can we turn that dish at the bottom for now, and maybe use a mini pci in the sector basebox for this link.
Pro99 to Ruffy - will this help us, or will it put more stress on our link over moontop? I would rather turn that rowards the plattekloof link that you were testing for Cheaptrick?
Also, we still have a spare netbox and dish looking for a new destination, what about testing that link to plattekloof from Potman?
Also, one last thing, I don't think the Neptune-Cheaptrick link is running particularly well, I'm not sure If I have LOS to Neptune, but I see ShadowClaw gets over 60mbit to cheaptrick, so maybe Neptune could bounce through there and make our speed that way a little better?
Thanks
Bruce
Bruce Pawley
Keith,
That SXT is test kit for the area, we have 2. The other one is being tested by a potential Pro99 client.
The problem is that it is SXT 5 lite, which is really not suitable for your link to Pro99, (Signal is really bad)
If we need more kit, we could try collect some money, I’m sure there are enough guys willing to donate for that link. Otherwise give me or Mark the dead sxt and we can try get it going again.
Mark/Anton are the old SXTs from your link still around
Bruce
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ctwug-bothasig/001f01d088a3%246df47b10%2449dd7130%24%40co.za.
Prins, Keith
The “dead” Lurker-pro99 SXT is lying at home, the one I refered to earlier as spare. I think mark did revive it. I will look at it tonight, we can then swop it back in and take the test kit SXT off.
I am trying to convince the recipient of my private link to buy another SXT before Saturday. It is only 300m away.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ctwug-bothasig/004b01d088a7%24f5131990%24df394cb0%24%40gmail.com.
Scharll Nextlevel
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ctwug-bothasig/001f01d088a3%246df47b10%2449dd7130%24%40co.za.
Mark
Hi Scharll I have the dish up but need to turn will try tomorrow or latest over the weekend if you don’t mind. If I remember you are on our whatsapp group will give you a call cheers Mark
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ctwug-bothasig/CAO8nXORyVO%2BaAQfAsBJPc2bUBPfXpFsCM0F5DT4aZ%3DmnrPGW6Q%40mail.gmail.com.
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 11590 (20150507) __________
Scharll Nextlevel
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ctwug-bothasig/000f01d088bc%24711f99f0%24535ecdd0%24%40co.za.
Michael Stadler
When lurker-jansen, Nextlevel-cheaptrick is up and running the bothasig area will be overflowed with data. Seapoint has been a long struggling area for the wug, I'm only asking to test if you guys are not happy with the results then that is fine with me.
But if it works well then ruffy will be connecting to Venus as well and I really don't see more strain on the Neptune link as Venus is already getting most of its traffic from there. The links will help with redundancy as Venus is link into Sq too. Ruffy also has a panel ready to connect wannabe wuggers in seapoint.
On the lurker end of things would it be better to put a 260gsp in the for the outgoing links then atleast we can login into the 260gsp and reboot. The enclosure is a bit small for a 750 260gsp and then switch.
Regards ogon
Prins, Keith
I have a RB 750 UP that is not being used. 1 of the POE ports fried when I had water running inside one of the cables, but the other 3 POE ports are good.
I am not sure how many ports on the current RB750 are being used, if not all, we can look at swopping.
Is there any other difference between the 260gsp and 750UP other than port speed.
Keith Prins
Business Application Specialist
Computacenter (SA)
Enabling Users
Parc Du Cap
Building 1
Mispel Road, Bellville, 7535,
Cape Town, South Africa
T: +27 (0) 21 957 4900
F: +27 (0) 21 948 3135
E: keith...@computacenter.com
www.computacenter.com
From: ctwug-b...@googlegroups.com [mailto:ctwug-b...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Stadler
Sent: 07 May 2015 02:00 PM
To: ctwug-b...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [CTWUG-BTS] Pro99-lnextlevel link
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CTWUG Bothasig" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ctwug-bothasi...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to ctwug-b...@googlegroups.com.
Scharll Nextlevel
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ctwug-bothasig/BE0665C9CE10BF42A4C3A02E8B598FE10E05BFF920%40ZABELEXENODEP01.computacenter.za.
Bruce Pawley
750UP is 100mbit
260GSP is Gigabit
From: ctwug-b...@googlegroups.com [mailto:ctwug-b...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Scharll Nextlevel
Sent: 07 May 2015 14:41
To: Wug Bothasig
Subject: Re: [CTWUG-BTS] Pro99-lnextlevel link
260 is a switch, 750 is a rb.
To post to this group, send email to ctwug-b...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ctwug-bothasig/CAO8nXOQYY2_Cqr2JVXyd6zNiABAZ7OiB41WFUXgtmQSQfa8J-g%40mail.gmail.com.
Michael Stadler
Lurker If I remember correctly that 750up was the reason your site rebooted every 30minutes the moment we took it out we never had that problem agian. I think internal more than port3 got damaged.
If it was my site this is how would do it. Currently inside the enclosure there is a switch and a rb750. I would take out the switch and replace it with the 260gsp.
My cable layout
260gsp
1. Wug 750
2. Pro99
3. Sector
4. Jannsen
5. Supaman
Wug 750
1 pvt Lan 750
2 non wug sxt
3
4
5
That is of if memory serves me right
This will allow poeple with login to 260gsp from Port 2 to port 5 to login and reboot the other frozen devices one by one. Maybe get the sector guys to contribute, this will benefit them most if they have spare change of course.
Routing if it was up to me I would then add all rbs to a /28 range and get rid of all the /30.
Regards ogon
Prins, Keith
Is anyone else coming to help?
________________________________________
From: ctwug-b...@googlegroups.com [ctwug-b...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Stadler [ogo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 5:02 PM
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CTWUG Bothasig" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ctwug-bothasi...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to ctwug-b...@googlegroups.com.
Bruce Pawley
Sent from my iPhone
Bruce Pawley
Bruce
Sent from my iPhone
> On 09 May 2015, at 10:20, Prins, Keith <Keith...@Computacenter.com> wrote:
>