You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Crossbar
Hey team,
I noticed the addition of defining a schema for each URI using "wamp.schema.define". This is great!! I had actually started down this road a few months back with the intention of creating something "SWAGGER" style to support the creation of tools. Two questions
If not, would you guys like help defining that? I am starting down the path anyways and figured I could kill 2 birds with one stone and help you guys standardize it.
Thanks
Eric
Elvis Stansvik
unread,
Nov 23, 2015, 12:43:54 PM11/23/15
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to cross...@googlegroups.com
Hi Eric,
2015-11-23 18:27 GMT+01:00 Eric Chapman <er...@headquartershq.com>:
> Hey team,
>
> I noticed the addition of defining a schema for each URI using
> "wamp.schema.define". This is great!! I had actually started down this
> road a few months back with the intention of creating something "SWAGGER"
> style to support the creation of tools. Two questions
>
> I see a reference to "http://wamp.ws/schema#" at
> http://crossbar.io/docs/Using-Schemas/ but couldn't find any extensive
> documentation. Have you actually defined the Schema?
I remembered Tobias discussing it on the Autobahn list last year, and
found the mail:
It briefly describes how wamp.reflect.define is to be called.
Not sure if it still applies though (Tobias?). And of course the spec
of it should be completed (it's in section 13.3.12 and 13.6.8 in the
RFC draft, which has "sketch" status) and then documentation written.
Elvis
> If not, would you guys like help defining that? I am starting down the path
> anyways and figured I could kill 2 birds with one stone and help you guys
> standardize it.
>
> Thanks
> Eric
>
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Crossbar
Hi Eric!
AFAIK we still want to go ahead with having schemas, and there isn't anything/much beyond what is documented.
So if you want to contribute here, then this is absolutely welcome. An immediate contribution could be to file an issue in the WAMP repo (e.g. "define WAMP schema") and describe your use case there, plus possibly your thoughts on your own design efforts.
We hope to be able to commit more time to working on WAMP soon.
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Crossbar
Excellent. Thank you Alex. The bulk of my motivation is that I am about to start building tools to automate things using the Schema and I definitely don't want to veer from the standard because that is not useful to anyone. I will write definitely submit something in the next day or so.