Dear developers:
good morning/evening.
Using pyrimidine, I try to understand how to compute 0'-0 fluorescence energy (wavelength).
In gaussian, this relatively well-established series of three calculations:
1) B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) Opt
2) B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) TD=(nstates=xx)
3) B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) Opt TD=(nstates=xx,root=state_of_interest)
Emission energy is the difference Eex - Eexgr, where
Eex is the energy of the excited state: print in the string "TD-KS".
Eexgr is the ground state energy of the excited state geometry: print for the string "HF=-".
Here, I attach current CP2K results for pyrimidine structural optimization
in the first excited state, while accounting the excitation set to include three states.
Upon every optimization cycle, the output file reports four energies, for example:
1) Total energy: -45.00011553431995
!--------------------------- Excited State Energy ----------------------------!
2) Excitation Energy [Hartree] 0.1408310694
3) Total Energy [Hartree] -44.
85928446504) ENERGY| Total FORCE_EVAL ( QS ) energy [a.u.]: -44.859271658539249
Would you comment what are these?
Why there are three TOTALS?
Next, in the input file I instruct
&MOTION
&GEO_OPT
MAX_DR 1.0E-03
MAX_FORCE 1.0E-03
RMS_DR 1.0E-03
RMS_FORCE 1.0E-03
OPTIMIZER CG
but, it seems, the output file does not report on the convergence criteria.
Does TDDFPT require additional instruction that such data would be printed
or this is out of the scope of the current package?
Finally, I see that upon the start:
- Excitation analysis -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Occupied Virtual Excitation
number orbital orbital amplitude
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 3.83221 eV
15 16 0.995900
14 17 -0.072640
2 4.07218 eV
15 17 0.989483
14 16 -0.140638
3 5.17410 eV
14 16 -0.982529
15 17 -0.137943
15 18 0.080624
13 16 -0.068511
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
while later, upon optimization:
- Excitation analysis -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Occupied Virtual Excitation
number orbital orbital amplitude
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 3.01565 eV
15 16 -0.997677
2 3.59856 eV
15 17 0.989952
14 16 -0.137983
3 4.63370 eV
14 16 -0.985780
15 17 -0.135202
15 18 -0.077828
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since the latter excitation energy of
3.01565 eV is significantly lower than the initial one of
3.83221 eV, should the difference of about 0.8eV correspond to the Stokes shift,
and the
3.01565 eV
would be the desired 0'-0 fluorescence energy?
Thank you.
I hope/wish the users would find my questions valuable.
With best wishes.
Victor