How to apply homogeneous finite electric field via the modern theory of polarizability

212 views
Skip to first unread message

Ke Zhou

unread,
Oct 31, 2019, 12:21:12 PM10/31/19
to cp2k
Dear all,

I want to simulate bulk water under electric filed. 
I know we can use &EXTERNAL_POTENTIAL to add electric filed. But I think it can only be used for slab system.
In the literature, I found macroscopic polarization and finite electric fields are treated with the modern theory of polarization.

So, how to apply homogeneous finite electric field via the modern theory of polarizability like in PWscf?

Best,
Justin 

hut...@chem.uzh.ch

unread,
Oct 31, 2019, 12:31:09 PM10/31/19
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Hi

have a look at this input section

CP2K_INPUT / FORCE_EVAL / DFT / PERIODIC_EFIELD

regards

Juerg Hutter
--------------------------------------------------------------
Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
Institut für Chemie C FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
Universität Zürich E-mail: hut...@chem.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
---------------------------------------------------------------

-----cp...@googlegroups.com wrote: -----
To: "cp2k" <cp...@googlegroups.com>
From: "Ke Zhou"
Sent by: cp...@googlegroups.com
Date: 10/31/2019 05:21PM
Subject: [CP2K:12443] How to apply homogeneous finite electric field via the modern theory of polarizability
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/32935721-76e3-4f69-a5f9-74b5b93cfa05%40googlegroups.com.

Ke Zhou

unread,
Oct 31, 2019, 12:45:26 PM10/31/19
to cp2k
Dear Juerg Hutter,

I think PERIODIC EFIELD means the potential is saw-like.  So it cannot be used for simulation of bulk water. 

Is there another alternative method?

Best,
Justin  

在 2019年11月1日星期五 UTC+8上午12:31:09,jgh写道:
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp...@googlegroups.com.

hut...@chem.uzh.ch

unread,
Oct 31, 2019, 1:01:33 PM10/31/19
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Hi

no, this is the Berry phase approach.
See the manual for more information and links to the relevant papers.

regards

Juerg Hutter
--------------------------------------------------------------
Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
Institut für Chemie C FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
Universität Zürich E-mail: hut...@chem.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
---------------------------------------------------------------

-----cp...@googlegroups.com wrote: -----
To: "cp2k" <cp...@googlegroups.com>
From: "Ke Zhou"
Sent by: cp...@googlegroups.com
Date: 10/31/2019 05:45PM
Subject: Re: [CP2K:12445] How to apply homogeneous finite electric field via the modern theory of polarizability
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/5703f430-e255-437b-851d-b7668319c98b%40googlegroups.com.

Ke Zhou

unread,
Nov 2, 2019, 11:08:16 PM11/2/19
to cp2k
Hi Juerg Hutter,

Thanks for your suggestions.
But comes another question that the temperature of bulk water increases with time if applying external electric field (EEF).

Here I use Noose Hoover thermalstat with time constant 100 fs and the EEF = 1 V/A. The initial structure is from AIMD simulation of bulk water without EEF. 

The appendix is my input file and one of the output file (*.ener). Can you give me some suggestion?

Best,
Justin





在 2019年11月1日星期五 UTC+8上午1:01:33,jgh写道:
WATER-1.ener
water.inp

hut...@chem.uzh.ch

unread,
Nov 4, 2019, 5:20:19 AM11/4/19
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Hi

I assume you don't want to add a LDA functional to revPBE?
&XC_FUNCTIONAL PBE
&PBE
PARAMETRIZATION revPBE
#SCALE_C 0.0
&END PBE
&VWN <----------
&END VWN <----------
&END XC_FUNCTIONAL

regards

Juerg Hutter
--------------------------------------------------------------
Juerg Hutter Phone : ++41 44 635 4491
Institut für Chemie C FAX : ++41 44 635 6838
Universität Zürich E-mail: hut...@chem.uzh.ch
Winterthurerstrasse 190
CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
---------------------------------------------------------------

-----cp...@googlegroups.com wrote: -----
To: "cp2k" <cp...@googlegroups.com>
From: "Ke Zhou"
Sent by: cp...@googlegroups.com
Date: 11/03/2019 04:08AM
Subject: Re: [CP2K:12449] How to apply homogeneous finite electric field via the modern theory of polarizability
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/c2bc8956-6973-49a3-bd7e-7f5abe792084%40googlegroups.com.


[attachment "WATER-1.ener" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]
[attachment "water.inp" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]

Ke Zhou

unread,
Nov 4, 2019, 8:03:59 AM11/4/19
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Hi Juerg Hutter,

Yes, I don't want to add a LDA functional to revPBE.

Do you means I should remove the VWN section?
Now I have removed it, but the temperature is still increasing.

By the way, I found when the EEF is applied, the potential energy of the system and Cons. Quantity (energy of system + thermalstat ) are also increased.

Best,
Justin

<hut...@chem.uzh.ch> 于2019年11月4日周一 下午6:20写道:
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/cp2k/MoOBNwVqNpI/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/OFEA23FDEB.A01ED7BE-ONC12584A8.0038C992-C12584A8.0038C994%40lotus.uzh.ch.

Jinggang Lan

unread,
Nov 6, 2019, 10:20:30 AM11/6/19
to cp2k
      &XC_FUNCTIONAL PBE     
         &PBE 
           PARAMETRIZATION revPBE 
         &END PBE 
      &END XC_FUNCTIONAL 
is for revPBE

I will use CSVR thermostat with 100 time-constant as it's more efficient for sampling compared to NH.
when EEF > 0.35 eV/A the water dissociates as shown by Saitta [https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.207801]
The proton hopping will be really fast under your potential, that's the reason why your temperature/energies are crazy.

<hut...@chem.uzh.ch> 于2019年11月4日周一 下午6:20写道:
 To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/c2bc8956-6973-49a3-bd7e-7f5abe792084%40googlegroups.com.


[attachment "WATER-1.ener" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]
[attachment "water.inp" removed by Jürg Hutter/at/UZH]

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/cp2k/MoOBNwVqNpI/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to cp...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/OFEA23FDEB.A01ED7BE-ONC12584A8.0038C992-C12584A8.0038C994%40lotus.uzh.ch.

Ke Zhou

unread,
Nov 8, 2019, 7:28:08 AM11/8/19
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Dear Jinggang,

It works well when I reduce the EEF. 
Thanks very much for your helps.

Best,
Ke 

Jinggang Lan <ljg19...@gmail.com> 于2019年11月6日周三 下午11:20写道:
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cp2k/1ba6def8-b1a6-48e3-85f5-d254a10de43c%40googlegroups.com.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages