You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Dear CP2K users,
I generated DZVP-MOLOPT-SR basis sets for some elements, but now I also want to optimize TZVP type of basis. In the existing BASIS_MOLOPT file, I found the first two columns corresponding to the first two zeta functions of each angular momentum in these two types are the same, such as C as follows (bold numbers in TZVP are the same as those in DZVP). Why are the first two columns the same, as well as the "polarization" term? Just cut the last column of triple-zeta to generate double-zeta type? Really appreciate your kind help! Thanks in advance!
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Hi
the usual steps to get a full set of basis sets of MOLOPT type are:
1) optimize ALL parameters (exponents and coefficients) at DZVP level.
I assume that is what you have done.
2) Optimize the additional coefficients for TZV2P, TZVP contractions.
The lower level basis sets are then derived from the highest (TZV2P in
this case) by deleting the additional contractions.
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Hi Juerg,
Thanks! I found the examples online.
So if I am right, derivative DZVP basis sets from TZV2P type are different from the original one (full-optimized) as the input. Which one should we use?