--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bvparishat/CAM%2BoyOci4B_OzySNQS0kfGuyt_hS0Jko6VKsZ0Rt8EpeatGQpg%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bvparishat/CAJypMHeRS6tLS%2BEwXnQfT0dHXY4aMR8knbj_O%2BbAmuvwHtwMuQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Sant Rajinder Singh Ji Maharaj Chair Professor (Retd.), IIT-Madras.
Former Director, Karnataka Samskrit
University, Bangalore.
Former Head, Dept. of Sanskrit, The
National Colleges, Bangalore.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bvparishat/CAN47gm6vZoq7F6jrhdGUXnkJhxmOetL%2BeiFAyMfeFUcT9QUrpQ%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bvparishat/CAOn3Y2StYQ_2ZZR%3D8LJc%3DVEO1vcm8_jev5C1yDEhoUoA7f%2B%3DUg%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bvparishat/CALw-kjUiSy3PxRh%2B8y9-Pi3cSTYiG9wHDJQzLPK99%2BiKfoZ_6g%40mail.gmail.com.
Namaste!
Prof.Pandurangi's talk is indeed very interesting. He is perhaps the only traditional scholar openly discussing RV hymns from a different perspective; by this I mean not just toeing the line of SAyaNAcArya.
Moreover, he is not a run-of-the-mill University Sanskrit Professor nor a professional indologist. We expect more from him. But my personal opinion is, one should not be reactive to western scholarship, one has to be proactive.
There are astonishingly different stories about Agastya & Lopamudra in later texts, the Nirukta, Bṛhaddevata, MBh, Puranas. Interpretation of RV based on later anthropological/mythological constructs leads to more confusions. To keep this post short:
1. LopAmudrA is a hapax in the Vedas (correction requested)
2. The entry of the Student of Agastya is contrived to give a viniyoga following Ṛgvidhāna for 179.5 &6.
3.The Ṛṣi as prevalent now 1,2->LM; 3,4->Agastya, 5,6-> antevāsi is as per anukramaṇis, that would be much later than the RV period.
4. The way Nirukta understands 4 to be the statement by Lopamudrā and not by Agastya



For verse 5, even Sāyaṇa gives alternate interpretations.
This is natural, since Soma is invoked. Who is Soma is an important issue. Is
it the Juice, drinking which the sin will be cleared? So two other possibilities
are stated that Soma may be Chandra /moon, or manas.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bvparishat/CAJGj9ea771mCDcxN%3DfQeM-y%3DeR33kh_k5m%3DkxwcDt9L1fksC%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bvparishat+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bvparishat/CAK%2BHosMKN9aqNRMJF%3D0MuBo49F0GgjfnVYbakknLPLRkH%3D5yfw%40mail.gmail.com.