Dear David,
For me, it seems that the nature of your work is more phylogeographic
than phylogenetic. First of all, my suggestion is to found the number
of genetic clusters through baps, Structure or similar, once you
recovered the composition of the genetic clusters you will be able to
estimate the divergence times among populations in BEAST using a
strict molecular clock and a substitution rate for the gene that you
are using. You can use the substitution rate for the same gene in a
related taxon, otherwise, you can be able to obtain the substitution
rate from a phylogenetic analysis, may be you will be able to include
some additional species or genera, use fossil record or vicariant
events in a wide phylogenetic frame, and estimate the substitution
rate for your lineage using a relaxed molecular clock .
On the other hand, the Mk model could be used for a Bayesian
phylogenetic inference of binary data (Lewis 2001) and a calibrated
tree could be obtained in BEAST using the “Tip-Dating” section (Turner
et al. 2017). An alternative is to use the Paleotree R library
(
https://pseudoplocephalus.com/2017/02/15/so-you-want-to-make-a-time-calibrated-phylogenetic-tree/).
Using either approach, you are able to recover a calibrated
phylogenetic tree from binary data.
Best regards
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "beast-users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
beast-users...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beast-users/b3811933-164a-4d60-95b0-11d9471d1ca8n%40googlegroups.com.
--
Omar Mejía G
Laboratorio de Variación Biológica y Evolución
Departamento de Zoología
Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas-IPN