using regex in replace module

23 views
Skip to first unread message

danish09

unread,
Dec 13, 2018, 5:23:25 AM12/13/18
to Ansible Project
Hey there,

I am using ansible 2.6.4. In on the projects I was working on, I had to search for 2 different words in the same file and replace them as necessary. Used replace module 2 times for this. Below is the playbook that I have used.

    - name: backup conf file and search and replace regex
      replace:
        path: /etc/nginx/sites-available/cruk-eb
        regexp: 'cert\.cruk\.org\.crt'
        replace: 'cert3.pem'
        backup: yes

    - name: backup conf file and search and replace regex again
      replace:
        path: /etc/nginx/sites-available/cruk-eb
        regexp: 'privkey\.cruk\.org\.key\.pem'
        replace: 'privkey3.pem'
        backup: yes


Is there a way that I can search and replace 2 words in one task/play


Pleas let me know if there is any other information that you need. And apologies if I have missed out anything.


Thanks

Danish.



 

Dick Visser

unread,
Dec 13, 2018, 6:43:42 AM12/13/18
to ansible...@googlegroups.com
This should do it:

- name: backup conf file and search and replace regex
replace:
path: /etc/nginx/sites-available/cruk-eb
regexp: '(privkey|cert)\.cruk\.org\.(key\.pem|crt)'
replace: '\g<1>3.pem'
backup: yes

Dick
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ansible Project" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ansible-proje...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to ansible...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/157209d1-ad23-4f62-ab98-bf5a373227da%40googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
Dick Visser
Trust & Identity Service Operations Manager
GÉANT

danish09

unread,
Dec 13, 2018, 11:42:18 AM12/13/18
to Ansible Project
amazing. thanks a lot. tried it just now and it did the magic. However, tried to give it a little thought. I am assuming 1 is for the expression with in the first bracket (). But since it is an OR '|', how does it know which word needs to be replaced with what and in which line. I mean could it not be possible that the words are replaced as privkey3.pem in the first line and cert3.pem in the second line., the other way round.

Hope I am clear

Thanks

Danish

Dick Visser

unread,
Dec 13, 2018, 12:24:29 PM12/13/18
to ansible...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 17:42, danish09 <danishsi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> amazing. thanks a lot. tried it just now and it did the magic. However, tried to give it a little thought. I am assuming 1 is for the expression with in the first bracket (). But since it is an OR '|', how does it know which word needs to be replaced with what and in which line. I mean could it not be possible that the words are replaced as privkey3.pem in the first line and cert3.pem in the second line., the other way round.

No. The pipe (OR) means it can match cert.cruk.org.something or
privkey.cruk.org.something.
Because of the parentheses around it, it can be used later on in the
replacement, this is called backreferencing.
And because it's the first match, it will normally be referenced in
the replacement string by '\1'.
However, because you need a number directly after that, this would
mean '\13` - which is interpreted as the 13th match and will fail.
We therefore have to use a numbered group to reference it, which is the '\g<1>'.
The second pair of parentheses also has an OR, meaning that the
extension can either be 'key.pem', or just 'crt'.
Your example doesn't require using that in the replacement later on,
so there is no '\2' or anything.

Dick
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ansible-project/0db22ad8-6dae-4442-b033-d77b7ef7abdb%40googlegroups.com.

danish09

unread,
Dec 14, 2018, 5:13:07 AM12/14/18
to Ansible Project
brilliant. thank you very much. finally seem to be making sense of regular expressions some what but still have a long way to go


Thanks again.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages