Hello Dwight-
I would agree. RID is problematic. My personal opinion is that we have seen RID be more problematic at times, and less at others. It seems the common denominator in all of that is the quality of the leadership, as elected by the membership. We currently have a board president who takes an authoritarian approach to leadership, which then negates the "member-driven" aspect of our association.
I may be biased as I was the one who signed CEO Grieser's contract, but I think she has done excellent work keeping us moving forward despite the current president. From my understanding, CEO Grieser didn't know that the COO was being terminated, nor that the position was going to be dissolved. Apparently, this was a complete surprise to the entirety of the HQ staff. What I find dismaying about this is that the COO answered to the CEO. The Board is responsible for governance while the CEO and COO are responsible for operations. It was not within the purview of the president to terminate a HQs employee, especially given that the employee has a direct supervisor and the supervisor was not communicated with about this decision. It was a surprise.
Robert- thank you for your request. It took a little time to get the actual letter, for obvious reasons. It is now attached.
In terms of how it came about, and I apologize if there are minor details that are off as there has been a lot of communication around this with a variety of people (not the CEO) who know different parts... Basically, CEO was called into a last minute meeting and was ambushed by a small subsection of the board with the surprise information that they were dissolving the position and terminating Mr. Sow. Then approximately 30min later Mr. Sow was brought in and the president explained what was happening. He was told to gather his things, and then he was escorted out of the building.
When asked why the COO position was being dissolved, they were told to "trust the process". When asked why Mr. Sow was being terminated and on what grounds, they were told to trust the process. When asked why Mr. Sow was being treated like a criminal, they were told it was just procedural.
Again, the letter sent to the staff is attached.
Jonathan