what's the plan after version after 0.37? add new feature? bug fix?

[qinmugong]

[Michael Diamond]

Being only a recent convert to web.py I can't speak for the developers, but I personally am interested in contributing to the project by making it Python 3 compatible, and according to comments here:  https://github.com/webpy/webpy/pull/172 web.py will support Python 2.3 until version 0.4.  I am not sure what sort of roadmap or timeline that lines up to.

Michael

Michael Diamond
dim...@gmail.com
www.DigitalGemstones.com

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, qinmugong <silentp...@gmail.com> wrote:

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/webpy/-/GMX1a8PgfhwJ.
To post to this group, send email to we...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to webpy+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en.

[qinmugong]

i think webpy is less active than other framework like django or  flask .i use webpy for a while and i really like the way it works, just have a little of worry about the future of webpy!

[W. Martin Borgert]

On 2012-08-11 23:02, qinmugong wrote:
> i think webpy is less active than other framework like django or flask .i
> use webpy for a while and i really like the way it works, just have a
> little of worry about the future of webpy!

The fact that web.py is "less active" is a major advantage for
me. web.py does more or less what it should, so I'm happy that
my application will (hopefully) not break tomorrow, when there
is an important bug fix. Python 3 support is desirable, IMHO.

[qinmugong]

you mean "backwards compatibility",yes ,that is good,but "developing actively" will be a good signal for someone want to use webpy on their real project, and that's means webpy user can get  good comunity support.

[Primoz Anzur]

"Real project"? What do you define as "real project"? Since web.py was used to run Reddit as well as various search engines to smaller sites, that statement makes no sense.

If you're interested in contributing to the project, feel free to submit patches, and perhaps with enough high-quality patches, you'll become one of the core developers and do something about this "development activity" issue. Of course with keeping in mind, that quantity doesn't spawn quality.

And :"good community support" doesn't sound too good, either. PHP has this "good community support", and 90+% of the applications written in it are straight down garbage.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/webpy/-/xjeZz8JCrh8J.

[Anand Chitipothu]

On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Michael Diamond <dim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Being only a recent convert to web.py I can't speak for the developers, but
> I personally am interested in contributing to the project by making it
> Python 3 compatible, and according to comments here:
> https://github.com/webpy/webpy/pull/172 web.py will support Python 2.3 until
> version 0.4. I am not sure what sort of roadmap or timeline that lines up
> to.

Yes, the plan to work on python 3 compatibility and build a simple
extension system.

Anand

[Tomas Schertel]

These two are really cool features.

[W. Martin Borgert]

Quoting "Anand Chitipothu" <anand...@gmail.com>:
> Yes, the plan to work on python 3 compatibility and build a simple
> extension system.

Sounds good to me, esp. Python 3!

Another (small) feature I like to see are sessions in memory.
I use a patch sent by Michele Petrazzo 2008-04-26 to this list
and I'm happy with it. Can it go into web.py?

[Tomas Schertel]

Why not make a pull request for it?

[W. Martin Borgert]

Quoting "Tomas Schertel" <tsch...@gmail.com>:
> Why not make a pull request for it?

Will do!