Hi Rodolfo,
sorry for late answer, I was out of office recently.
I solved MRCPv2 load balancer using FreeSwitch. It works fine as long as you bypass media, i.e. you do not let the proxy modify SDP. Check offer sent by MRCP client before proxy and the offer arriving to the server after the proxy, it should be identical.
I have no experience with OpenSips, but I can provide you with my FS scripts/dialplan/configuration if you are interested.
Cheers,
- Vali
Dne 28.6.2011 16:08, Rodolfo Rodrigues napsal(a):
Hi!
I read your post in
http://groups.google.com/group/unimrcp/tree/browse_frm/month/2010-12?_done=%2Fgroup%2Funimrcp%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fmonth%2F2010-12%3F&
<http://groups.google.com/group/unimrcp/tree/browse_frm/month/2010-12?_done=%2Fgroup%2Funimrcp%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fmonth%2F2010-12%3F&>
about load balancer and UniMRCP.
Now, I'm working in a load balancer to UniMRCP using OpenSips. The
UniMRCP servers already receive SIP connections but it doesn't receive
MRCP requests.
Could you help me, please?
Should I put RTPproxy or sth?
Regards,
Rodolfo Rodrigues de Araujo
mod_distributor is also available to do round robin distribution.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "UniMRCP" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/unimrcp/-/_6ktIcnzbSQJ.
To post to this group, send email to uni...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to unimrcp+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/unimrcp?hl=en.
Thanks for sharing this with us.
I have been asked several times for such a solution. There is a
certain demand in the MRCP load balancer for large deployments. So,
the topic sounds very interesting to me and might be indeed quite
useful for many of us.
The idea of using a typical stateful SIP proxy as the load balancer
looks good. The solution built on top of FreeSWITCH should work fine
as a simple load balancer. However additionally, the load balancer
should ideally be capable of tracking the MRCP resources (synth,
recog, verif,..) being negotiated and used; queering the capabilities
of MRCP servers, etc. Perhaps this wouldn't be a simple task
anymore...
Anyway, I'd like to thank you once again for your input to the project.
Cheers,
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "UniMRCP" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/unimrcp/-/_6ktIcnzbSQJ.
> To post to this group, send email to uni...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> unimrcp+u...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/unimrcp?hl=en.
>
--
Arsen Chaloyan
Author of UniMRCP
http://www.unimrcp.org