Possible 0.8.0 regression

11 views
Skip to first unread message

Rich

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 1:16:45 PM10/31/12
to sqlal...@googlegroups.com

I've attached a test script that illustrates a regression in the 0.8 branch compared to the 0.7 branch.

I know the example doesn't make a lot of sense in its current form as I've had to chop out tons of code to make it minimalistic.  It appears that the problem deals with specifying a key on a table column under certain conditions.  Removing the params statement in the query resolves the problem (I know that the params don't make sense in this query, they do in my production code).  Also taking the key='id' off of product_offering_id and changing the query accordingly resolves the issue.

So perhaps the params don't deal with column keys correctly?
test.py

Michael Bayer

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 2:01:46 PM10/31/12
to sqlal...@googlegroups.com
thanks, this is a quick one where you can see the details at http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/2597.   Just need to write a couple of tests and that will go right in.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sqlalchemy/-/i1t3xnxH2wkJ.
To post to this group, send email to sqlal...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
<test.py>

Michael Bayer

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 2:31:56 PM10/31/12
to sqlal...@googlegroups.com
the fix is in, if you download from http://hg.sqlalchemy.org/sqlalchemy/archive/default.tar.gz you can keep testing.    I'll probably put out b2 today or tomorrow.

Rich

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 2:49:11 PM10/31/12
to sqlal...@googlegroups.com
Thank you, and a big applaud to everybody for a fantastic new version.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages