deisotoping in msconvert affects iTRAQ reporter ion labels; can deisotoping only occur for >= 140 m/z

72 views
Skip to first unread message

Gautam Saxena

unread,
Jan 18, 2013, 10:28:14 PM1/18/13
to spctools...@googlegroups.com
Deisotoping (in the msconvert option) significantly improves search results for iTRAQ data. However, it also has very bad affects on the reporter ions. Is there a way to get msconvert to only do deisotoping for those spectra in which the m/z >= 140 (ie above the reporter ion levels)? Is this something that can be customized? If not, is there a good workaround to this problem -- eg running msconvert for ms2 below 140 (no desitoping) and again for above 140 (with deisotoping) and somehow merging the mzXML files?

Eric Deutsch

unread,
Jan 19, 2013, 1:44:01 AM1/19/13
to spctools...@googlegroups.com, Eric Deutsch

Sounds like a pretty easy and worthwhile feature to add. Maybe you can convince one of the ProteoWizard folks to add it.

 

In the mean time you could create one set of mzMLs with deisotoping for searching, and then swap in a second set of mzMLs without to execute Libra.

 

Eric

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/spctools-discuss/-/ka_LbRhkNXMJ.
To post to this group, send email to spctools...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to spctools-discu...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.

Gautam Saxena

unread,
Jan 22, 2013, 1:15:19 PM1/22/13
to spctools...@googlegroups.com, Eric Deutsch
Dear ProteoWizard,

I know msconvert is open source, so if we had the skills and expertise, we could make what appears to be an easy change, but therein lies the problem. Given our lack of expertise here, is there a proper way to request this feature enhancement so that it can be implemented "correctly"?
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages