You can't dispute my position. And you are embarrassed to confront the
inconsistencies that I exposed in your model.
I think this ends the discussion. Once again, you got nothing!!!
> YOU are making these claims, therefore it is up to YOU to provide the
> observations and experiments that show you to be correct.
LOL. Why would I bother? You've essentially conceded the argument.
> Of course, you can't do it because there is no proof, no observations, and no
experiments that you have performed to prop you up.
>
> Just another McGinn rant with no teeth. As always, you've got NOTHING!
So, essentially, your argument is structurally identical to somebody that saw a ghost and thinks its everybody else's duty to prove they didn't.
Here are the facts that you failed to contradict:
1) There is zero reliable, non-anecdotal evidence of expansiveness
and buoyancy playing a role in storms. (The observational
data that does exist can best be described as being much more
frequent than but equally as anecdotal as that associated with big
foot sightings.)
2) In stark contradiction to what the (now discredited) convection
model of storm theory predicts, storms are correlated with low
pressure not high pressure. (The belief that it predicts low
pressure despite the obvious fact that it does not appears to be
a part of a larger group delusion or cult-based notion.)
3) Atmospheric flow is not pushed by high pressure but can more
accurately be described as being pulled by low pressure stemming
from the jet streams. (And so, in a sense, atmospheric flow
isn't pushed, it is pulled. Jet streams are the source of the
concentrated and directed low pressure that pulls the rest of the
atmosphere along.)
4) The properties (poorly understood) of water (suspended
microdroplets) under wind shear conditions are instrumental to the
emergence of the plasma (plainly viewable as the sheath of a
tornado) that provides the leverage (structural) that facilitates
all of the above, through vortices that provide their fast moving
contents (air flowing, sometimes, at speeds upwards of 300 mph)
isolation from the friction of the atmosphere and, at one and the
same time, provide the upper troposphere the means by which it,
essentially, maintains its grip on the lower troposphere and,
simultaneously, stays hydrated. (Fortunately for ourselves and all
other land based animals, it ["it" being, essentially, the jet
stream{s}] is a sloppy drinker.)
5) Convection plays no role what-so-ever!!! The convection model is
a cartoon based on fictional physical principles the underlying
basis of which is pixie dust. (There is actually an exception to
this rule that is beyond the scope of this examination.) And the
people that believe it does are, like, fairies, very nice people
and very simple, but not scientist. They are best ignored, or
shooed off to flutter away.