I think you mis-counted the zeros. It suggests haml take 1.5 times as
long erb. However it is irrelevant either way as only a tiny
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Tommaso Visconti
> <
tommaso....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Fahim Patel ha scritto:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I have just move towards to learn Ajax . Before learning Ajax one big
>>> question raised to me what to use haml or erb.
>>> From day one of Rails, i have used only .erb files.
>>> I read DRY feature of haml and haml really impress me.
>>>
>>> I really wish to use haml .
>>>
>>> Before use i raised some questions :-
>>> 1 . Is there are more advantage execluding dry feature of haml over erb.
>>> 2 . Is there any limitation or drawback of haml .
>>> 3. Give me some quick start to Ajax but should be simple because i have
>>> only theoretically knowledge of Ajax.
>>
>>
>> I always use .erb but in the last project I had to use haml. of course it
>> has a dry syntax, but my opinion is that it distorts the concept of
>> templating language. The use of haml makes you learn another syntax
>> different from html, but a view, at the end, is html..
>> I don't like it much :)
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.