Make Italy Great Again

[popinjay]

Below is a headline from fake news agency CNN:

"Can anything save Italy from a return to fascism?"


If CNN scumbags are saying this, it can only be good.

Good luck to our Italian brothers on the Right tomorrow.

[popinjay]

Salvini has promised to deport the 600,000 boat migrants who have arrived in Italy over the past four years.

[BillB]

On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 7:06:19 AM UTC-8, popinjay wrote:

> Salvini has promised to deport the 600,000 boat migrants who have arrived in >Italy over the past four years.

And his party is polling at under 15%.

Always remember the BillB Racism Theorem which states that approximately 20% of people in each of the various Western democracies are hardcore racists.

[fffurken]

On Sunday, 4 March 2018 19:12:03 UTC, BillB wrote:

> Always remember the BillB Racism Theorem which states that...

Racism comes in only one color and that color is white?

[BillB]

Wow... in just a few short years you've gone from calling Irish Mike an Islamophobe to plagiarizing him. How long until you start sucking his cock?

[fffurken]

On Sunday, 4 March 2018 20:36:18 UTC, BillB wrote:

> > Racism comes in only one color and that color is white?
>
> Wow... in just a few short years you've gone from calling Irish Mike an Islamophobe to plagiarizing him.

Using the term 'Islamophobe' is reasonably understandable ten or fifteen years ago. Now? No.

> How long until you start sucking his cock?

I'm not "sucking his cock". The quote occurred to me in this context (of the Italian elections). You clearly think that of the "20% hardcore racists" in Western democracies 100% of them are white. Who else would vote for the 'Populist', house niggers?

[popinjay]

Can you imagine? 600,000 Africans flooding a tiny country like Italy?

[BillB]

On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 1:26:00 PM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:

> On Sunday, 4 March 2018 20:36:18 UTC, BillB wrote:
>
> > > Racism comes in only one color and that color is white?
> >
> > Wow... in just a few short years you've gone from calling Irish Mike an Islamophobe to plagiarizing him.
>
> Using the term 'Islamophobe' is reasonably understandable ten or fifteen years >ago. Now? No.

Ten years ago was 2008. What was different? How did Irish Mike know to fear Muslims before you did? Do you concede Irish Mike is far smarter than you?

> > How long until you start sucking his cock?
>
> I'm not "sucking his cock".

lol...of course you are. You are copying him word for word. Haven't you ever heard the saying that plagiarism is the sincerest form of cocksucking?

>The quote occurred to me in this context (of the Italian elections). You >clearly think that of the "20% hardcore racists" in Western democracies 100% of >them are white. Who else would vote for the 'Populist', house niggers?

What did you mean when you said this:

"... the significance of the death of 3000 *humans* remains the same regardless
of their nationality. Don't you think? Or perhaps you can't see that
because you can't get beyond your brainless nationalistic emotions."

[fffurken]

On Sunday, 4 March 2018 22:11:45 UTC, BillB wrote:

> What did you mean when you said this:
>
> "... the significance of the death of 3000 *humans* remains the same regardless
> of their nationality. Don't you think? Or perhaps you can't see that
> because you can't get beyond your brainless nationalistic emotions."

Yes, I would believe that much of my use of the term 'Islamophobia' on RGP was probably related to 9/11. This appears to be the time warp that the likes of you and BSinAustin (clueless Islamophiles) are stuck in.

Irish Mike was always "nationalistic" to the point that he supported (IRA) terrorism, something we did not agree on. In fact, my (staunch) opposition to terrorism, whether it be Islamic or any other kind, has always been consistent and impeccable.

Now tell us, what percentage of the 20% of "hardcore racists" in Western democracies are non-white, in your estimation?

[fffurken]

How about a million into a *tiny* country like Ireland?

(they're really ramping up the rhetoric over here of late)

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/02/24/irish-mass-migration/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VG47lcH8DRA #Ireland2040

[BillB]

On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 2:44:38 PM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:


> Yes, I would believe that much of my use of the term 'Islamophobia' on RGP was >probably related to 9/11. This appears to be the time warp that the likes of >you and BSinAustin (clueless Islamophiles) are stuck in.

So it was a valid word when you used it? Irish Mike was an Islamophobe 10 years ago, but now he's not an Islamophobe? That's your story and you're sticking to it?

What did you mean by "brainless nationalistic emotions"? I thought you were all about nationalism? Or is this just another one of your youtube induced childlike phases?

> Irish Mike was always "nationalistic" to the point that he supported (IRA) terrorism, something we did not agree on. In fact, my (staunch) opposition to terrorism, whether it be Islamic or any other kind, has always been consistent and impeccable.
>

Wow...you have always been against terrorism?? INCREDIBLE CONSISTENCY! lol

> Now tell us, what percentage of the 20% of "hardcore racists" in Western >democracies are non-white, in your estimation?

Probably about 10% of the 20% (so 2%). But white racism and non-white racism are not of the same quality. Racism from a group that holds all the power is far more destructive and consequential than racism from people who have no power.
If you took a couple of introductory sociology courses you would already know that.

[fffurken]

On Monday, 5 March 2018 04:11:01 UTC, BillB wrote:

> So it was a valid word when you used it? Irish Mike was an Islamophobe 10 years ago, but now he's not an Islamophobe? That's your story and you're sticking to it?

How many times does it have to be explained to you before you'll understand it. I thought I put it quite succinctly earlier on in the thread -

"Using the term 'Islamophobe' is reasonably understandable ten or fifteen years ago. Now? No."

That would obviously entail all of the wisdom and knowledge that would have come with those years (for a normal, non-brainwashed person).

> What did you mean by "brainless nationalistic emotions"? I thought you were all about nationalism? Or is this just another one of your youtube induced childlike phases?

I've always been a nationalist (check the archives).

> > Irish Mike was always "nationalistic" to the point that he supported (IRA) terrorism, something we did not agree on. In fact, my (staunch) opposition to terrorism, whether it be Islamic or any other kind, has always been consistent and impeccable.
> >
>
> Wow...you have always been against terrorism?? INCREDIBLE CONSISTENCY! lol

Well I think the point would be that I have not been in any way hypocritical. You can't accuse me of not condemning terrorism in any way, shape or form. Whatever the cause.

> > Now tell us, what percentage of the 20% of "hardcore racists" in Western >democracies are non-white, in your estimation?
>
> Probably about 10% of the 20% (so 2%). But white racism and non-white racism are not of the same quality. Racism from a group that holds all the power is far more destructive and consequential than racism from people who have no power.
> If you took a couple of introductory sociology courses you would already know that.

So you're saying that whites are NINE times more likely to be racist than blacks? This is your defence of the sentiment attributed to you - that "racism comes in only one color and that color is white", along with all the rest of your sociological blither? lol Yeah OK, sure. Whatevs.

[BillB]

On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 8:44:36 PM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:

> "Using the term 'Islamophobe' is reasonably understandable ten or fifteen years ago. Now? No."
>
> That would obviously entail all of the wisdom and knowledge that would have come with those years (for a normal, non-brainwashed person).

LOL..nothing is known about Islam today that wasn't known 10 years ago, you idiot. All you are saying is "10 years ago I was ignorant to basic facts about the world, but now I'm not! Honest!!"

>
> > What did you mean by "brainless nationalistic emotions"? I thought you were all about nationalism? Or is this just another one of your youtube induced childlike phases?
>
> I've always been a nationalist (check the archives).

So what are "brainless nationalistic emotions"?

> Well I think the point would be that I have not been in any way hypocritical.

I didn't say you were hypocritical. You're just hold opposite viewpoints over an incredibly short period of time. That suggests to me that you are exremely gullible and impressionable.

>You can't accuse me of not condemning terrorism in any way, shape or form. >Whatever the cause.

Uh, I never said you didn't "condemn terrorism" (for all that's worth...lol). I wasn't even talking about terrorism.

> > > Now tell us, what percentage of the 20% of "hardcore racists" in Western >democracies are non-white, in your estimation?
> >
> > Probably about 10% of the 20% (so 2%). But white racism and non-white racism are not of the same quality. Racism from a group that holds all the power is far more destructive and consequential than racism from people who have no power.
> > If you took a couple of introductory sociology courses you would already know that.
>
> So you're saying that whites are NINE times more likely to be racist than >blacks?

Low-IQ misinterpretation. I take it you were never very good at arithmetic? Did you consider the percentage of non-whites in the population? No, you did not. lol What a moron.

[fffurken]

On Monday, 5 March 2018 05:08:35 UTC, BillB wrote:

> LOL..nothing is known about Islam today that wasn't known 10 years ago

I know. Which only makes it all the more striking that you don't know anything about it to this day. But this due to other factors, like willful ignorance, and your ideology.

> > I've always been a nationalist (check the archives).
>
>
> So what are "brainless nationalistic emotions"?
>
> > Well I think the point would be that I have not been in any way hypocritical.
>
> I didn't say you were hypocritical. You're just hold opposite viewpoints over an incredibly short period of time. That suggests to me that you are exremely gullible and impressionable.

It's important not to be hypocritical, IMO.

> >You can't accuse me of not condemning terrorism in any way, shape or form. >Whatever the cause.
>
> Uh, I never said you didn't "condemn terrorism" (for all that's worth...lol). I wasn't even talking about terrorism.

Wasn't really sure what you were babbling about tbh

> > > > Now tell us, what percentage of the 20% of "hardcore racists" in Western >democracies are non-white, in your estimation?
> > >
> > > Probably about 10% of the 20% (so 2%). But white racism and non-white racism are not of the same quality. Racism from a group that holds all the power is far more destructive and consequential than racism from people who have no power.
> > > If you took a couple of introductory sociology courses you would already know that.
> >
> > So you're saying that whites are NINE times more likely to be racist than >blacks?
>
> Low-IQ misinterpretation. I take it you were never very good at arithmetic? Did you consider the percentage of non-whites in the population? No, you did not. lol What a moron.

So what is the percentage of white racists versus non-white racists, per capita, in your estimation?

[BillB]

On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 11:12:03 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

> And his party is polling at under 15%.
>
> Always remember the BillB Racism Theorem which states that approximately 20% of people in each of the various Western democracies are hardcore racists.

They are now projected to win 16% of the vote. Another neo-fascist party took about 5%.

[popinjay]

If anyone resembles fascists it would be those on the Left. Although, I really don't care to engage your trolling and bullshit racism obsession.

[BillB]

On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 12:06:07 AM UTC-8, popinjay wrote:

> If anyone resembles fascists it would be those on the Left.

Ah yes, those awful people who believe in fairness, justice and equality. Of course you hate them. You would have fit in much better in a different (more backward) century.

Why do you discriminate so violently on the basis of skin color, but not at all on eye color or hair color? Is there any logic at all behind that? (Don't worry, I'm really not expecting a logical answer. There isn't one.)

[fffurken]

On Monday, 5 March 2018 05:30:47 UTC, fffurken wrote:

> So what is the percentage of white racists versus non-white racists, per capita, in your estimation?

^ Dodge noted

[fffurken]

lol.. Billb gets it spectacularly wrong, again.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTYiqn6DeMg

[BillB]

I already answered that question, you arithmetical illiterate.

More importantly, you are ignoring what I said about the quality and importance of racism between races. I am just not very interested in racism coming from people with no power to act on it. It's there, but it is relatively inconsequential.

[fffurken]

On Monday, 5 March 2018 18:42:24 UTC, BillB wrote:
> On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 10:36:05 AM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:
> > On Monday, 5 March 2018 05:30:47 UTC, fffurken wrote:
> >
> > > So what is the percentage of white racists versus non-white racists, per capita, in your estimation?
> >
> > ^ Dodge noted
>
> I already answered that question, you arithmetical illiterate.

lol.. What a liar

[BillB]

I didn't get anything wrong. The two hardcore racist parties got about 20% of the vote, just as I said.

[fffurken]

lol Which party got 5% (of the "hardcore (white) racist" vote), what are you babbling about?

[BillB]

On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 11:27:09 AM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:>

lol Which party got 5% (of the "hardcore (white) racist" vote), what are you babbling about?

Can you repeat the question, but in English this time?

[fffurken]

By the way, how many "hardcore (white) racists" voted for the left? You would have (if you bothered to vote) and you're a hardcore white racist.

And if 20% of the people are Nazis (chortle) in Western democracies, what percentage of the population do you reckon are lobtomised, suicidal, cultural marxists, such as yourself?

[fffurken]

Baha! He claims he doesn't know what I'm talking about...

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec.gambling.poker/31zs12za5_U/GmALXkqVBQAJ

lol Everyone can see he's a liar

[popinjay]

On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 10:28:34 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
> On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 12:06:07 AM UTC-8, popinjay wrote:
>
> > If anyone resembles fascists it would be those on the Left.
>
> Ah yes, those awful people who believe in fairness, justice and equality.

You're so full of shit.

[fffurken]

On Monday, 5 March 2018 18:44:09 UTC, fffurken wrote:
> On Monday, 5 March 2018 18:42:24 UTC, BillB wrote:
> > On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 10:36:05 AM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:
> > > On Monday, 5 March 2018 05:30:47 UTC, fffurken wrote:
> > >
> > > > So what is the percentage of white racists versus non-white racists, per capita, in your estimation?
> > >
> > > ^ Dodge noted
> >
> > I already answered that question, you arithmetical illiterate.
>
> lol.. What a liar

And as we can see here, Billb has made an admission, by his own "arithmetic" (chortle) that non-white people are every bit as likely to be "hardcore racist" as white people*. Yet he only ever focuses on white people. 20 years he's spent spewing racial hatred against white people on RGP

*Some wouldn't agree with that, which makes sense, considering the white race is the most compassionate and least racist race of them all (it's not even close).