What this country needs is a Country Bike

132 views
Skip to first unread message

Manuel Acosta

unread,
Feb 18, 2012, 1:15:06 AM2/18/12
to RBW Owners Bunch
Found this on trackosaurus. Old article but still relevant for today.
http://outyourbackdoor.com/newarticle.php?id=397

-Manny

Mike

unread,
Feb 18, 2012, 9:59:59 AM2/18/12
to RBW Owners Bunch
In some ways things have changed since then. Availability of bikes
with bigger/better clearances has grown. Salsa is marketing some
pretty interesting bikes for camping, or as they refer to it
"Adventuring". The Surly Pacer with its adjustment for true 32s (w/out
fenders), the All City Mr Pink, and other road frames are out there
now that take 32s. There's also the Salsa Casseroll which is rather
Rivish in clearances and usage. I'm not saying all these bikes are
perfect or even close to a Riv in terns of quality and function but
there are more of them out there than in 2005 when Grant wrote that
article and they're not all bad.

--mike

On Feb 17, 10:15 pm, Manuel Acosta <manueljohnaco...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Jim

unread,
Feb 18, 2012, 10:09:48 AM2/18/12
to RBW Owners Bunch
Not so much a country but a rural work-horse. I live 6 miles from a
small town, 14 from a medium sized one. It is a 30 mile (oneway) ride
to shop in the "big city" (Mankato). That said, I have a variety of
bikes but my mainstay is my SUV, a Surly Big Dummy. I have 32's on my
NatureBoy and 2.25 on my troll. The canti-studs are coming off the
dummy this week, bring on the hookworms (2.5)! Life is an adventure,
it is not uncommon to do 100mile days fully loaded.

PATRICK MOORE

unread,
Feb 18, 2012, 2:14:06 PM2/18/12
to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com
I wouldn't call randonneur bikes "country bikes" if the Sam Hillson is a country bike: the former are much more roadlike, if my categorization is correct. OTOH, bikes like the Fargo split the difference between a mountain bike and a bike like the Sam Hill: they are more biased toward dirt but ride decently with fattish road tires.

Patrick Moore, who just re-discovered the joy of a sub 18 lb gofast fixie ('99 Joe built custom) after six months of leaving it hanging on my garage wall -- damn' fast!

>
> -Manny

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




--
Patrick Moore
Albuquerque, NM
For professional resumes, contact
Patrick Moore, ACRW
http://resumespecialties.com/index.html



Steve Palincsar

unread,
Feb 18, 2012, 4:12:21 PM2/18/12
to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 12:14 -0700, PATRICK MOORE wrote:
I wouldn't call randonneur bikes "country bikes" if the Sam Hillson is a country bike: the former are much more roadlike, if my categorization is correct.

Here's my MAP Randonneur:



Now as David Allen Coe says, If That Ain't Country... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhEHB0a7Uyg


map.jpg

Bertin753

unread,
Feb 18, 2012, 5:23:22 PM2/18/12
to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com, rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com
But that ain't no Sam Hill! As good a bike as the Sam is, I wonder if Jan would classify it as a randonneur; more like an all-rounder?



Patrick Moore
iPhone

Steve Palincsar

unread,
Feb 18, 2012, 6:16:08 PM2/18/12
to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 15:23 -0700, Bertin753 wrote:
> But that ain't no Sam Hill! As good a bike as the Sam is, I wonder if
> Jan would classify it as a randonneur; more like an all-rounder?

I'm pretty sure I've seen a Sam Hill at one of DC Randonneurs brevets,
and the owner was one of the regulars. So, that one, for sure, would
count as one. Thing is, Rivendells come from the "versatile" rather
than the "resolved" end of the spectrum. They can be many things,
depending on how the owners equip them. One of those things can be an
all-rounder.

Peter Pesce

unread,
Feb 18, 2012, 7:53:33 PM2/18/12
to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com
Ironically, I just bought the 2005 back issue of VQ (then VBQ) that has the interview with GP and JH, and it's funny to see their differing opinions. Grant is all "it's great if a bike is flexible to be equipped any way someone wants" and Jan is all "but didn't the French essentially figure out how to make a fully equipped bike that can do everything?" and Grant is all "they're great but that doesn't work for everyone. Give me flexibility" and Jan's all like "great points, but why aren't we just building rando bikes for everyone..."

Pete (tastes great AND less filling!) in CT

James Warren

unread,
Feb 18, 2012, 8:09:16 PM2/18/12
to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com, David, Dan Hardin, GEli

Good description of the issue.
I am seriously grateful that I get to live in a time when such a debate can be had!

>--
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.

>To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/sqYy-M9GlkUJ.

Mike

unread,
Feb 18, 2012, 8:41:59 PM2/18/12
to RBW Owners Bunch
On Feb 18, 5:09 pm, James Warren <jimcwar...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Good description of the issue.
> I am seriously grateful that I get to live in a time when such a debate can be had!
>
>
Yes! It's an exciting time for those of us that appreciate and desire
all-road bikes.

I have a couple of bikes and almost all of them could be classified as
country bikes as far as I'm concerned although I would consider my
dedicated randonneur bike the least countryish of them all. Still,
I've taken it on dirt roads in the past and am sure to take it on dirt
roads in the future.


--mike
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages