> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/yvzKHjhKCjAJ.
> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
>
--
Patrick Moore
Albuquerque, NM
For professional resumes, contact
Patrick Moore, ACRW
http://resumespecialties.com/index.html
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/8Z_mO2WEsicJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:58 AM, erik jensen <bicyc...@gmail.com> wrote:
1. > NYT knows such an article will generate quite a lot of buzz in the cycling
> community, garnering them page hits and ad revenue (etc etc etc).
>
2. The guy is a hack volunteer,
3. there is no problem in
> copenhagen with the bicycle in any way not to be expected of the dominant
> mode anywhere else (cars here), and
1. the NYT is successfully trolling both
> the cyclist community and the bike lane haters of US metropolitan areas.
>
I am the first to defend my rights to bicycle on the roads against
agressive motorists, but a knee-jerk reaction to criticism of cyclists
both angers and saddens me.
--
Tho' I am not *always* right in every instance.