--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/RsANZblSLyJViX1EDgDg-umCCJKCS6uYV84htPiRjjgAuW7G_3nx-fAOrLD7VMDqtEDkSKbm16jPyTWsAk1QyXCF8cz2CUi-mP04jrpmgn8%3D%40sagegerard.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/CAJYbDa%3DotA_tNaD1troPWF9XDoj_hg0dMKKpiR1xQV%2BKMip%2BHQ%40mail.gmail.com.
I'm resuming work on a very early-stage project that generates FFI bindings for Vulkan in Racket [1]. VkTk is the closest relative project I have found for reference [2].Last time I was on the project I was focused on generating bindings from the API registry. That has not changed. I considered use of Dave Herman's C library [3] on vulkan.h directly, but the XML spec has supplemental data, and vulkan.h has preprocessor directives that I would like to capture for completeness.Once I am finished with the bindings. would anyone be available to contribute/run tests in the hopes that we can make this viable faster? I intend to run any applications on Windows 10 and a 1080Ti, but that's about all of the configurations that I can verify. I'll definitely need guinea pigs and feedback.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-users/20191021221758.zgifjnokcw6xbnq3%40topoi.pooq.com.