persevere installation failed in ubuntu-10.04

20 views
Skip to first unread message

RajaM

unread,
Feb 14, 2012, 7:21:21 AM2/14/12
to Persevere
Hi members !!!
Am totally new for this forum . need your help today i tried to
install persevere example wiki through npm install persevere-example-
wiki.. everything done well and i started the app using node index.js
from inside the wiki folder. then accessed localhost:8080 and it's
showing a default page " page not yet created use create page link."
Once i clicked that link nothing working ...

Pls give me the proper installation guide to install the same in my
machine ..

Ubuntu-10.04 (32 bit)


by
Rajamani M
NIC -OTC

W.S. Hager

unread,
Feb 15, 2012, 6:04:25 AM2/15/12
to persevere...@googlegroups.com
Ah I see. The edit module is not found by requirejs. Neither is the
monitor module. That's odd. Perhaps try adjusting the requirejs paths
in public/edit.html?

2012/2/14 RajaM <rajama...@gmail.com>:

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Persevere" group.
> To post to this group, send email to persevere...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to persevere-frame...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/persevere-framework?hl=en.
>

--
W.S. Hager
Lagua Web Solutions
http://lagua.nl

W.S. Hager

unread,
Feb 15, 2012, 6:07:30 AM2/15/12
to persevere...@googlegroups.com
This seems to be a (new) firefox related issue. It works in Chrome.

2012/2/15 W.S. Hager <wsh...@gmail.com>:

W.S. Hager

unread,
Feb 15, 2012, 7:17:13 AM2/15/12
to persevere...@googlegroups.com
Damn I knew this... the problem is in promised-io/process.js

sys is no longer in use, plz update this file!

To fix comment out all lines having sys or system (that doesn't seem
to affect anything).

2012/2/15 W.S. Hager <wsh...@gmail.com>:

Kris Zyp

unread,
Feb 16, 2012, 2:34:42 PM2/16/12
to persevere...@googlegroups.com, RajaM
OK, I believe this should be fixed now (with the 0.3.2 version of the
promised-io package). This was due to interesting new optimization that
Firefox just deployed where it does static time optimization of
concatenated strings that confused the AMD loader.
Kris

Ben Hockey

unread,
Feb 17, 2012, 9:20:47 AM2/17/12
to persevere...@googlegroups.com, RajaM
kris,

can you point to some info about the firefox optimization?  i'm guessing this may be something that could affect AMD loaders more generally and would be good to post to the amd-implement list.

thanks,

ben...

Kris Zyp

unread,
Feb 17, 2012, 6:45:28 PM2/17/12
to persevere...@googlegroups.com, Ben Hockey, RajaM
In FF, the following code is pre-optimized:
> (function(){require("a"+"b")}).toString()
"function () {\n require(\"ab\");\n}"

And AFAICT all other browsers keep the addition operation intact.

I was trying to use concatenated strings to avoid the having the scanner
detect the require call. Aliasing the require to "req" seemed to fix it.

Kris

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Persevere" group.

> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/persevere-framework/-/32Xrw2Y0vAQJ.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages