Thanks for the feedback!
> Let's start:
>
> 1) "Edit Card" window doesn't have a maximize button, but you can
> change the size manually, so I suppose it's a bug. "Add cards" has
> maximize button.
I'll look into this for 2.0
> 2) I understand the problem with big images is being fixed, with a
> scrollbar.
> Please, don't do it! :)
>
> a better solution could be
>
> 1.-resize images to fit on the Question or Answer window, whatever
> the size of the window is.
> 2.-sometimes you need to zoom in the picture to see small details, so
> clicking on it, would zoom in, releasing the mouse button would
> restore the size. It could be to the size of the question/answer
> window, the main mnemosyne window, or to the size of the window
> desktop.
It's a nice idea, however it's a lot more work to implement. For 2.0, I'll
stick with just the scrollbar, as it's much better than what we have now, and
later on we can revisit this.
> 3) Why a separate window to edit the cards? The most useful option in
> Supermemo was to be able to live edit the cards, sometimes to change
> the formatting, sometimes to rewrite the question and make it better.
That would be possible for simple two sided cards, but for 3 sided cards (or
the more complex card types that Mnemosyne 2.0 supports), that will be very
difficult to achieve.
> 4)Another very useful thing in Supermemo was to be able to keep the
> formatting of things you copy from the web. I simply don't want to go
> adding styles to my cards. and if I do it with a script, I can only do
> it to groups. That makes my cards boring and repetitive, unless I
> spend an incredible amount of time making them nice and "unique".
In the current version, already a lot of html formatting is allowed. 2.0 will
be much better in that regards.
> 5)(following on 4) I know cards can be formatted, but I think it falls
> a bit short. Wouldn't it be better to allow CSS stylesheets at both,
> category and card level? That way you could say all the cards from
> category X will look like this, and if any of the cards has it's own
> stylesheet, use it instead.
2.0 uses CSS at the card type level.
> 6)I couldn't find a "Duplicate card" or simply "Copy/Paste" option,
> and sometimes it is very useful when you only need to change a couple
> of words to make a new card for another item you want to learn.
I see where you are coming from, but its a bit strange to have both a 'remove
duplicates' option and one that says 'duplicate cards'.
If your cards often contain similar info, than it's much better to use a card
type which has some of the fields already prefilled (should be possible in
2.x).
Cheers,
Peter
> a bit short. Wouldn't it be better to allow CSS stylesheets at both,
> category and card level? That way you could say all the cards from
> category X will look like this, and if any of the cards has it's own
> stylesheet, use it instead.2.0 uses CSS at the card type level.
I just upgraded Ubuntu from 12.04 to 12.10 and therefore come from Mnemosyne 1.x (I don't know which) to Mnemosyne 2.0-RC1. There seems to be interesting changes, I still need to explore that.
I can't see where I can specifiy the CSS at the card type level. Where should I save the .css file?
The functionality is implemented, but not exposed to the UI. Please
vote for 'UI support for N-sided card types' on our uservoice forum.