Have you been able to do any high resolution prints? Mine just sits there at 0% when I tell it to print at high resolution.Thanks,Mark
My first time using the natural PLA (normally use various other colors)...love it so far.
My thoughts so far:
Have you been able to do any high resolution prints? Mine just sits there at 0% when I tell it to print at high resolution.Thanks,Mark
On Thursday, October 25, 2012 9:24:07 AM UTC-7, Bartholomew wrote:
...As far as software, Makerware 1.0.1 has worked well, although like the others, using the High Quality (0.1mm layer height) setting results in an absurdly long slicing and g-code generation time. It is worth it, since the prints at this height are stunning. However, I am usually tempted to use Medium quality for the faster solution time. It's orders of magnitude different; there's something wrong with the code....
Okay it took all day to slice the model shown above but the printout didn't work at all it started lifting off the build plate. I then tried the bracelot model and it printed out skewed to one side:
I then tried printing the comb - but I had to leave it unattended and resulted in a gummed up extruder, see the image below:
--To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/makerbot/-/eUFRq2ULz40J.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MakerBot Operators" group.
To post to this group, send email to make...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to makerbot+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/makerbot?hl=en.
Can you leave the machine un-attended during long prints, and when it is finished with a print does it turn off the heat to the extruder nozzle?Steve
Hi everybody,I have the new rep 2 since yesterday and I made some test prints.the first one was "bolt & nut" form the SD card and the result looks great but it was "impossible" to screw one each other.The second was an own piece that curls a lot (medium quality). I tried using the raft and works great.The third was a small piece with high quality first but the result was very bad. Then I tried again with medium quality with a lot better result. The only problem was that the small hole (5 mm) was 0,4 mm smaller.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MakerBot Operators" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/makerbot/-/a5uzMumxOEAJ.
To post to this group, send email to make...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to makerbot+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/makerbot?hl=en.
<la foto-4.JPG><Sin título.tiff>
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to makerbot+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to makerbot+u...@googlegroups.com.
I tried another high quality print from Makerware after the upgrade to 6.2 and it is slightly better but still has the styrofoam quality. The medium quality prints from Makerware seem to be working.
Another problem I am having is that the print job quits mid way through a print regularly. I have taken apart print head and cleaned it numerous times - sometimes that seems to help but other times not. Any suggestions for that problem.
One other note: I have noticed that after I have printed something out and if I try to print something else - it is messed up. I have to turn off the Makerbot and then turn it on again and then it seems to work again.
Finally a successful self-created object (with the latest medium settings from Makerware), see the attached image. This took a lot of work and two jobs that quit mid way through.
From: itzalak2 Sent: Wednesday, 7 November, 2012 5:43:46 AM PDT To: make...@googlegroups.com Reply To: make...@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [MakerBot] Re: Replicator 2 - First Impressions |
I've had mine for a week or so and it definitely hasn't been out of the box 100 micron prints. My problems seem related to the slicer being used (and settings). For the 'high' (100 micron) resolution it uses Skeinforge and most of the settings are hidden from you (in MakerWare). At the 'medium' (270micron) quality I was almost printing nicely out of the box, but have had to clean out the drive gear in the extruder system and adjust the tension and play with the temperature a little. But, at 'medium' it uses the Miracle Grue slicer which works nicely (albeit at lower resolution).I've tried ReplicatorG to slice and generate an s3g file but I'm not sure Replicator2 is truly supported -- the 039 release has a Replicator2 machine profile, but no default slicing settings. The GitHub repo has some slicing profile checked in, but copying it into my 0039 ReplicatorG directory as recommended in this thread didn't seem to result in generating gcode that my Replicator2 enjoyed. In fact, during all of this the machine shut down oddly several times (LED display goes off, no communication, LED build area light stays on). So, I'm not sure what I should be able to do with ReplicatorG and my Replicator2 right now -- jog the axes? Or send an s3g file MakerWare exports?I've also tried printing from the SD card. Printing from an SD card requires an s3g file. An s3g file is a little more than a gcode file and the https://github.com/makerbot/s3g repo has some tools for dealing with s3g (e.g. converting from s3g, decompiling). My idea was to try Slic3r to generate gcode, create s3g using makerbot/s3g example scripts and then drop that on the SD card. Unfortunately, I was not able to create gcode in Slic3r that Makerbot's s3g was happy to convert -- there are PreProcessors (recently renamed GcodeProcessors) in to convert gcode from, e.g., Slic3r to Makerbot dialect, before generating the s3g from the processed gcode, but I haven't had time to figure out why it isn't converting nicely.All that said, I am new to operating a 3d printer. I did not expect to have this much difficulty when I bought a Replicator2 but I still like the thing more than most things. I expect some of these issues are my fault being new and kinda dumb sometimes, and some of this Makerbot will release software fixes for in the near future.
On Wednesday, November 7, 2012 11:34:17 PM UTC-8, Avandss wrote:
Here's what I don't understand...


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MakerBot Operators" group.
Dan
Dan
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to makerbot+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/makerbot/-/7YYU8fuc-m0J.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to makerbot+u...@googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MakerBot Operators" group.
To post to this group, send email to make...@googlegroups.com.
Dan