An alternative day-of-week list

24 views
Skip to first unread message

M.Nael

unread,
Nov 16, 2011, 2:51:36 PM11/16/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
Coi rodo

I'm sorry I've been of the grid lately, but I haven't forgotten what I was working on; it's just I got caught in other things...
I'm here to (quickly) propose a new listing for the days of the week in Lojban:
Why not have the week start with Saturday? In Egypt (and in Islam generally), the week ends on Friday, so Saturday would serve well as the first day of the week if we count Friday as the week end in Islamic culture. For western cultures, of which I'm only aware of what I read in stories, ie. Monday is the first work day... Saturday would still do well, if we count that you take your holidays the first thing in the week, much like the relief (or pain?) that you get with your paycheck at the start of the months ;)

›› I'll also return to the guide I (falsely) assumed I'd be able to get ready last week... I should work on it a bit more the next Friday... As well as a new logo; I've an idea that you're gonna love! or kill me for!

Coho mihe Moxa'med 
Feho

Jonathan Jones

unread,
Nov 16, 2011, 4:24:08 PM11/16/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
No. Just no. If you want a reason why, refer to the 50-million previous discussions on weekdays, weekday numbering, weekday names, etc.

It ain't broke. Stop trying to fix it.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/ybsCqQ33FLEJ.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.



--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

Pierre Abbat

unread,
Nov 17, 2011, 1:13:05 AM11/17/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
On Wednesday 16 November 2011 14:51:36 M.Nael wrote:
> Coi rodo
>
> I'm sorry I've been of the grid lately, but I haven't forgotten what I was
> working on; it's just I got caught in other things...
> I'm here to (quickly) propose a new listing for the days of the week in
> Lojban:
> Why not have the week start with Saturday? In Egypt (and in Islam
> generally), the week ends on Friday, so Saturday would serve well as the
> first day of the week if we count Friday as the week end in Islamic
> culture. For western cultures, of which I'm only aware of what I read in
> stories, ie. Monday is the first work day... Saturday would still do well,
> if we count that you take your holidays the first thing in the week, much
> like the relief (or pain?) that you get with your paycheck at the start of
> the months ;)

We don't need another one. We already have three (numbers, with two words for
Sunday; East Asian derived; colors). I don't know of any natlang with more
than two (Portuguese-Galician has two, of which Portuguese uses one and
Galician the other). The East Asian sequence (soldei ce'o lurdei ce'o fagdei
ce'o jaudje ce'o mudydei ce'o jimdei ce'o derdei) doesn't have an intrinsic
start of the week.

I looked up the Arabic names of days of the week; they all match the Hebrew
names except for يوم الجمعة, for which the Hebrew is יום ששי (sixth day).
Sunday doesn't look like it matches but it does (ri'shon, first, is no
cognate of echad, one). So in Arabic, as in Hebrew, Sunday is the first day.

Pierre
--
La sal en el mar es más que en la sangre.
Le sel dans la mer est plus que dans le sang.

tijlan

unread,
Nov 17, 2011, 3:38:45 AM11/17/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
What about those non-7-day weeks?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Week#.22Weeks.22_in_other_calendars

There can be no consistent correspondence for the starting day of the
week unless we ignore certain calendars with different cycles.

Why would Lojbanistan choose the 7-day week? Because it's an
international standard, adopted by the ISO? Isn't that adoption on
hegemonic rather than scientific grounds? Is there any real neutral
basis for the days of the week of any traditional calendar as there
are for the length of the Earth's day or year?

I care about which day is "Monday" etc. only as long as other people
do. Personally, I would be happy to get rid of those traditional time
units and live by the days of the year: "on the 32nd ... 182nd ...
365th" (yes, no months either).

mu'o

Jonathan Jones

unread,
Nov 17, 2011, 5:02:21 AM11/17/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
Based on the information on that page, only one of those examples of other-than-7-day weeks is in use today, that being the Javanese 5-day one. All the others are either clearly no longer used or as in the case of the Nigerian 4-day week, ambiguous as to their current week.

In contrast, the 7-day week is used worldwide. I don't doubt it would be very difficult indeed to find a single culture on this planet that doesn't use the 7-day week - even if they also use a other-than-7-day week.

Regardless, the reason for Lojban going with a 7-day week is simple: The vast majority, if not the entirety, of the world, has 7 days in their weeks, which makes things rather simple to decide.

So, to reiterate: It ain't broke. Stop trying to fix it.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

Sebastian Fröjd

unread,
Nov 17, 2011, 6:12:35 AM11/17/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
I agree with Jonathan. The 7-day week is used worldwide and should therefore be the lojbanic standard by default.
But if there's another standard, perhaps based more on scientific/logical, I would think that could be fascinating.
So I think everyone is free to use alternative standards as long as it clear from context or explicit expressed as seltau or put in the standard place.
mu'o mi'e jongausib

2011/11/17 Jonathan Jones <eye...@gmail.com>

M. Nael

unread,
Nov 17, 2011, 8:25:37 AM11/17/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
.oi
Frankly, I stopped counting how many times I provoked pent-up frustration here, even though I never meant too...
Anyway, I think what's on now is Sunday, الأحد, etc... as the first day, which should make sense (Sunday=1, Friday=6 and Saturday=0) if not that it wasn't that clear in the lessons.

Consider this page closed unless you for some reason decide otherwise.
fe'o

Craig Daniel

unread,
Nov 17, 2011, 9:20:21 AM11/17/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:38 AM, tijlan <jbot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What about those non-7-day weeks?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Week#.22Weeks.22_in_other_calendars
>
> There can be no consistent correspondence for the starting day of the
> week unless we ignore certain calendars with different cycles.
>
> Why would Lojbanistan choose the 7-day week? Because it's an
> international standard, adopted by the ISO? Isn't that adoption on
> hegemonic rather than scientific grounds? Is there any real neutral
> basis for the days of the week of any traditional calendar as there
> are for the length of the Earth's day or year?

Yes, actually. At least, maybe.

The seven-day week arose independently in Latin and Germanic-speaking
cultures, in the latter case at a time when a lunar calendar was in
use which used direct observation of the moon to mark the beginning of
the month (when the crescent moon is first visible after sunset), with
some holidays on the full moon (including the first day of Yule). As
the moon looks full for several days (I am told, though I don't know
why it should be so, that this is especially true at higher latitudes
such as those of Northern Europe), picking a day as the actual "full
moon" date isn't a trivial observation to make the way the start of a
lunation is - but you can get an almost right answer that is
guaranteed to not be visibly wrong if you assume that it's two weeks
after the day you observe the first crescent. That this heuristic was
in actual use is not proven, but it seems likely; this would imply
that the week is half a fortnight, rather than the fortnight being
originally a term for two weeks.

This certainly isn't culturally neutral - it's only useful in
pre-modern lunar calendars! - but it is, at least, a basis in physical
phenomena.

tijlan

unread,
Nov 17, 2011, 11:17:11 AM11/17/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
On 17 November 2011 10:02, Jonathan Jones <eye...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Based on the information on that page, only one of those examples of
> other-than-7-day weeks is in use today, that being the Javanese 5-day one.
> All the others are either clearly no longer used or as in the case of the
> Nigerian 4-day week, ambiguous as to their current week.
>
> In contrast, the 7-day week is used worldwide. I don't doubt it would be
> very difficult indeed to find a single culture on this planet that doesn't
> use the 7-day week - even if they also use a other-than-7-day week.
>
> Regardless, the reason for Lojban going with a 7-day week is simple: The
> vast majority, if not the entirety, of the world, has 7 days in their weeks,
> which makes things rather simple to decide.

I understand that. Most people on this planet are not only familiar
with at least one of the 7-day week systems but also organize their
life according to such cultural time units. The majority of Westerners
care about which day is "Sunday" and plan on particular activities
accordingly often because that's when they are given mutual (socially
meaningful) time-off and entertainment opportunities by tradition. As
for those countries that didn't have "Sunday" as a day of rest or a
holiday ("Holy Day") or even the distinction between working /
non-working days, especially the non-Western or non-Christian
communities, they would begin observing it in the same way the
Westerners did, especially since the colonial period, because, as you
say, it would "make things rather simple to decide" *in global
hegemonic situations*. Otherwise, the week system could be considered
unnecessary, unhelpful, or even confusing. It was introduced to Japan
before the 10th century C.E. but didn't take on until 9 centuries
later during its rather compulsive Westernization period, because
month days were useful enough for day-calculating businesses such as
lending.

So, the point is not only about "how many days should a week have" but
also "why should there be any week in the first place". As far as
Earthlings are concerned: one rotation makes one day; one revolution
makes one year; what natural, scientifically observable basis makes 7
days 1 "week"?


On 17 November 2011 11:12, Sebastian Fröjd <so.co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with Jonathan. The 7-day week is used worldwide and should therefore
> be the lojbanic standard by default.

There are many conventions that are worldwide but haven't been made a
Lojbanic standard. I think there ought to be other criteria for
deciding on such a matter in addition to historic prevalence,
especially for use in Lojban, where cultural assumptions are supposed
to be critically challenged.


> So I think everyone is free to use alternative standards as long as it clear
> from context or explicit expressed as seltau or put in the standard place.

If I said "mi dansu ca la [Sunday-cmevla]" for people in the U.S., I
would be implying mostly the first day of week that is a holiday; if
for Europeans, the last day that is a holiday; if for the Middle
Easterners, the second day that is a working day; and so on. Lojban
doesn't really need to officially dictate which one is "the first day
of week".

mu'o

tijlan

unread,
Nov 17, 2011, 11:23:42 AM11/17/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
On 17 November 2011 14:20, Craig Daniel <craigb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The seven-day week arose independently in Latin and Germanic-speaking
> cultures, in the latter case at a time when a lunar calendar was in
> use which used direct observation of the moon to mark the beginning of
> the month (when the crescent moon is first visible after sunset), with
> some holidays on the full moon (including the first day of Yule). As
> the moon looks full for several days (I am told, though I don't know
> why it should be so, that this is especially true at higher latitudes
> such as those of Northern Europe), picking a day as the actual "full
> moon" date isn't a trivial observation to make the way the start of a
> lunation is - but you can get an almost right answer that is
> guaranteed to not be visibly wrong if you assume that it's two weeks
> after the day you observe the first crescent. That this heuristic was
> in actual use is not proven, but it seems likely; this would imply
> that the week is half a fortnight, rather than the fortnight being
> originally a term for two weeks.
>
> This certainly isn't culturally neutral - it's only useful in
> pre-modern lunar calendars! - but it is, at least, a basis in physical
> phenomena.

je'e ki'e

Sid

unread,
Nov 17, 2011, 12:48:56 PM11/17/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
Obviously, we should switch to 3.14 day weeks.

The first day of the week is based on how many flies are born in a
single day from a single cluster of eggs, as determined by the
Lojbanic Institute of Fly-Time.

A revolution in keeping time is in our hands, people.

Jonathan Jones

unread,
Nov 17, 2011, 3:18:03 PM11/17/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
In Lojban, Sunday is both nondei (0-day) and xeldei (7-day). Monday is pavdei (1-day), Saturday is xavdei (6-day).

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

guskant

unread,
Nov 17, 2011, 9:19:08 PM11/17/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
coi

2011/11/18 Jonathan Jones <eye...@gmail.com>:
> In Lojban, Sunday is both nondei (0-day) and xeldei (7-day). Monday is
> pavdei (1-day), Saturday is xavdei (6-day).

According to the definition, x3 of nondei is a calendar, which depends on culture. The x1 of it is therefore not necessarily "Sunday" that most of people think of. I mean the English translation "Sunday" seems semantically too restrictive for the valsi "nondei". The lojbanic definition should be something like
"x1 no moi lo'i djedi goi x2 poi jeftu zo'e x3", which does not conflict with the actual English definition. With this lojbanic definition, the valsi "nondei" can be used in any culture, and the indicated thing may vary according to the culture. The similar consideration can be applied to the other days of the week.

mi'e guskant mu'o

Jonathan Jones

unread,
Nov 17, 2011, 10:33:17 PM11/17/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
Oh yay. Now we've devolved to arguing semantics.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/HK8fqc8ttm8J.

To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

M.Nael

unread,
Nov 18, 2011, 2:38:35 AM11/18/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
Oh yay. Now we've devolved to arguing semantics.
I had cleared my hand of this. 

guskant

unread,
Nov 18, 2011, 5:55:13 AM11/18/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com

.alyn.post.

unread,
Nov 21, 2011, 4:14:36 PM11/21/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com

.ide'a mi puza krici lo du'u lo namcu detri cu nitcu zo moi
to zo pavmoidei mupli toi

.imu'o mi'e .alyn.
--
.i ma'a lo bradi cu penmi gi'e du

Oleksii Melnyk

unread,
Nov 28, 2011, 1:25:41 PM11/28/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
On 17 November 2011 13:12, Sebastian Fröjd <so.co...@gmail.com> wrote:
But if there's another standard, perhaps based more on scientific/logical, I would think that could be fascinating.

Well, I've found the zo'o logical one. At least for the majority of the city dwellers, as we know them. Mapping that to selbri seems tricky, so let's assume, that is not needed. cmene variant can be easily tweaked to personal taste, I prefer the "detri"s rafsi.

de'i zo u'o | la .u'ode'i.
de'i zo oi | you've got the idea
de'i zo ei | (may be "a'i")
de'i zo o'o
de'i zo a'o
de'i zo uo
de'i zo o'u

A bit too similar, however that's emotion system's fault:)
--
mi'e lex mu'o

selpa'i

unread,
Nov 28, 2011, 2:01:23 PM11/28/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
Am 28.11.2011 19:25, schrieb Oleksii Melnyk:


On 17 November 2011 13:12, Sebastian Fröjd <so.co...@gmail.com> wrote:
But if there's another standard, perhaps based more on scientific/logical, I would think that could be fascinating.

Well, I've found the zo'o logical one. At least for the majority of the city dwellers, as we know them. Mapping that to selbri seems tricky, so let's assume, that is not needed. cmene variant can be easily tweaked to personal taste, I prefer the "detri"s rafsi.

de'i zo u'o | la .u'ode'i.


*{la .u'ode'i} is not grammatical. You need a consonant cluster in there.

Jonathan Jones

unread,
Nov 28, 2011, 2:44:27 PM11/28/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
What are you talking about? .o'udei. is a name. It doesn't need a cluster, it's needs a consonant at the end. {la .u'odeis.}

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.

selpa'i

unread,
Nov 28, 2011, 3:32:05 PM11/28/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
That works too. You can either have the cmevla {.u'ode'is.} or make a brivla like {.o'urde'i}.

Michael Turniansky

unread,
Nov 29, 2011, 9:14:05 AM11/29/11
to loj...@googlegroups.com
Or you can use u'o zei djedi (that's what zei's for, after all)
--gejsypa
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages