I'd like mine to be the official one. It requires more work on my
end yet before I consider it in good enough shape to submit as a
proposal.
There are not substantive differences, right now, between
jbogenturfa'i and camxes. The files are different at the bit-level,
but the parser level produces the same result. Robin and I have
shared patches as errata have come up.
The grammars will diverge when I merge my magic-word work. I got
burned out on that effort last year and have been trying to restart
it. It is standing in the way of other work I'd also like to do.
So far life keeps intervening.
mi'e .alyn.
> 'roll Their own' can, if not*should,*do so*and We'll sort out the
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 03:58:26PM -0500, Frank wrote:
> So, I'm a wee bit confused and I apologize if this was brought up before.
> Is there a "de facto" standard for the would-be PEG grammar of lojban? Is
> it .alyn.'s? Robin's? Are We going by the principle of "Anyone willing to
> differences later"?--
> Just curious.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "lojban" group.
> To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
my personal website: http://c0redump.org/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 02:27:12PM -0700, Jonathan Jones wrote:camxes most certainly *does* have magic word parsing:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:07 PM, .alyn.post.
> <alyn...@lodockikumazvati.org>wrote:
>
> > I'd like mine to be the official one. It requires more work on
> > my end yet before I consider it in good enough shape to submit
> > as a proposal.
> >
> > There are not substantive differences, right now, between
> > jbogenturfa'i and camxes. The files are different at the
> > bit-level, but the parser level produces the same result. Robin
> > and I have shared patches as errata have come up.
> >
> > The grammars will diverge when I merge my magic-word work. I
> > got burned out on that effort last year and have been trying to
> > restart it. It is standing in the way of other work I'd also
> > like to do. So far life keeps intervening.
> >
>
> You mean, because you'll /have/ magic-word parsing, which no other
> parser has as of yet?
rlpowell@stodi> echo 'mi klama lo nu do klama si si sutra' | camxes
text
sentence
|- CMAVO
| KOhA: mi
|- bridiTail3
|- BRIVLA
| gismu: klama
|- sumti6
|- CMAVO
| LE: lo
|- tanruUnit2
|- CMAVO
| NU: nu
|- BRIVLA
gismu: sutra
-Robin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.