Is that right? Not clear on the beginning but it sounds good to me.
--
Daniel Lyons
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To post to this group, send email to loj...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban?hl=en.
{.deiv.} is "Dave". {.daiv.} sounds like "dive".
Cute, though.Isn't propaganda, though. Just says stuff in Lojban, doesn't assert a point of view.http://jbotcan.org/jbo/wakaba.html We've got lots of that.THIS is *actual* propaganda from my campaign to get people to quit bitching and actually get some work done.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/a7KgSsCXVNgJ.
Daniel Lyons
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
On Friday, September 21, 2012 3:23:21 PM UTC-6, tsani wrote:{.i .u'u doi la daiv .i .e'anai ku'i mi na curmi le nu do go'i}For this purpose you should use {lo} (using {le} here offers no benifits really. There're almost no practical cases where {le nu} is ever needed.){.e'a} (and by extension {.e'anai}) is what we call an "irrealis attitudinal". What that means is that it basically describes a non-real world. {.e'anai do go'i} by *itself* means "I'm not letting you do that," whereas {.e'anai mi na curmi lo nu do go'i} means "I'm not allowing it to not be the case that I allow you to do that," which sounds approximately as semantically wrong in English as it does in Lojban :p.
Thanks for explaining all this. I was the least certain of this one in particular (and "ko xabju" but I didn't see a closer word for "abide", but I think the ambiguity is part of the fun of that movie).
I take it either of these alternatives would be closer then:
- .u'u doi la .dev. .ie'anai go'i
- .u'u doi la .dev. .i ku'i mi na curmi lo nu do go'i
Is that true?
Otherwise the pictures are pretty good. The "style" is a bit weird, but that's simply due to being new.
Hopefully that will improve as I read more.
.i'osai ui .i lo cnino cu se jmina vau .a'o
Thanks! :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lojban" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban/-/GDTg8Y64beQJ.