zo'oi pomegranate se fanva fu ma

44 views
Skip to first unread message

gleki

unread,
Jul 7, 2012, 2:04:05 AM7/7/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
zo'oi pomegranate se fanva fu ma

i lo nu bacru zo rutrgranate cu nandu mi

ianek

unread,
Jul 7, 2012, 4:02:09 AM7/7/12
to Lojban Beginners
do kakne lo nu pilno la'o gy buffer vowel gy noi se valsi ma la lojban

mu'o mi'e ianek

Lindar

unread,
Jul 7, 2012, 6:17:06 AM7/7/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
I suggest {granatu} from the linnean name "granatum".

gleki

unread,
Jul 7, 2012, 6:46:27 AM7/7/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
oh my. I even adore this chaos in lojbanists' views.
To tell you the truth I don't like lujvo and fu'ivla Type 3 at all.

On Saturday, July 7, 2012 2:17:06 PM UTC+4, Lindar wrote:
I suggest {granatu} from the linnean name "granatum".

Your suggestion looks naturalistic but as for biological taxonomy everyone is right and everyone is wrong. Even biologists can't (and will never) come to a conclusion what to name this or that organism.

I think this is the only part of Lojban where we should "let usage decide".
In all the other cases Lojban must be regulated.

ianek

unread,
Jul 7, 2012, 7:46:10 AM7/7/12
to Lojban Beginners
lujvo aren't half bad, but I don't think anybody loves stage-3
fu'ivla. The only advantage is that you have some hint on the meaning
if you hear the word for the first time. For the price of sounding
absolutely horrible.

On 7 Lip, 12:46, gleki <gleki.is.my.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> oh my. I even adore this chaos in lojbanists' views.
> To tell you the truth I don't like lujvo and fu'ivla Type 3 at all.
>
> On Saturday, July 7, 2012 2:17:06 PM UTC+4, Lindar wrote:
>
> > I suggest {granatu} from the linnean name "granatum".
>
> Your suggestion looks naturalistic but as for biological taxonomy everyone
> is right and everyone is wrong. Even biologists can't (and will never) come
> to a conclusion what to name this or that organism.
>
> I think this is the only part of Lojban where* *we should* "let usage
> decide".*

MorphemeAddict

unread,
Jul 7, 2012, 1:07:55 PM7/7/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
And how do you propose that the language be regulated? 

stevo 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/HZRI8YQ0P4MJ.

To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.

Jacob Errington

unread,
Jul 7, 2012, 4:37:15 PM7/7/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
It might be so that taxonomists can't figure out what to call this
thing or that thing, but they will eventually come to some kind of
conclusion, not to mention that such disagreements probably have to do
with species that're so uncommon or bizarre that we would most
certainly never need to actually talk about them, unless Lojban should
become the language of science, which is highly unlikely.

Concerning the fact that "no one like type-3 fu'ivla," it's my opinion
(and that of a handful of others on IRC) that type-3 are the ideal
solution for fu'ivla. On the other hand, I personally think that
type-4 zi'evla should be reserved/used primarily for lojban-based
zi'evla, which in my opinion are the good alternative to cimjvo.

Anyway, as for "pomegranate" itself, we had this discussion in IRC and
determined grutrgranate be the best word for it. Conversationally, I
think that you could presumably drop the grutr- after having said the
full word once or twice.

mu'o mi'e la tsani

Lindar

unread,
Jul 8, 2012, 3:49:32 AM7/8/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
In all honesty my biggest complaint is the nagging idea that you prefer {granate} to {granatu} and named it thus because of the English name for the item and not the linnean name as is customary. It's my own weird twitch-reaction, but I'm going to cry malglitarmi on this simply for the fact that it is anything more than vaguely similar. It has nothing to do with a preferred final vowel and everything to do with the fact that you're making stuff look like English because you speak English.

gleki

unread,
Jul 8, 2012, 4:04:37 AM7/8/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com


On Saturday, July 7, 2012 9:07:55 PM UTC+4, stevo wrote:


On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 6:46 AM, gleki <gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:
oh my. I even adore this chaos in lojbanists' views.
To tell you the truth I don't like lujvo and fu'ivla Type 3 at all.

On Saturday, July 7, 2012 2:17:06 PM UTC+4, Lindar wrote:
I suggest {granatu} from the linnean name "granatum".

Your suggestion looks naturalistic but as for biological taxonomy everyone is right and everyone is wrong. Even biologists can't (and will never) come to a conclusion what to name this or that organism.

I think this is the only part of Lojban where we should "let usage decide".
In all the other cases Lojban must be regulated.

And how do you propose that the language be regulated? 

pe'i it was discussed long ago. Search for some Robin's paper called "Lojban, you are doing it wrong" or something.

stevo 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/HZRI8YQ0P4MJ.

To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

gleki

unread,
Jul 8, 2012, 4:10:26 AM7/8/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com


On Sunday, July 8, 2012 12:37:15 AM UTC+4, tsani wrote:
It might be so that taxonomists can't figure out what to call this
thing or that thing, but they will eventually come to some kind of
conclusion, not to mention that such disagreements probably have to do
with species that're so uncommon or bizarre that we would most
certainly never need to actually talk about them, unless Lojban should
become the language of science, which is highly unlikely.

Concerning the fact that "no one like type-3 fu'ivla," it's my opinion
(and that of a handful of others on IRC) that type-3 are the ideal
solution for fu'ivla. On the other hand, I personally think that
type-4 zi'evla should be reserved/used primarily for lojban-based
zi'evla, which in my opinion are the good alternative to cimjvo.

Type 3 fu'ivla is not unnaturalistic at all. Ancient Egyptian (ju'ocu'i the eldest written language that we are aware of) 
actually had such type of words.
e.g.
nfrnfrnfrpr pronounced as nfrw means "foundations of a house" where pr means house in order to distinguish it from other homophones pronounced as nfrw as well.

It's like {grutrgranate} and {tricrgranate} in Lojban.


Anyway, as for "pomegranate" itself, we had this discussion in IRC and
determined grutrgranate be the best word for it. Conversationally, I
think that you could presumably drop the grutr- after having said the
full word once or twice.

mu'o mi'e la tsani

On 7 July 2012 13:07, MorphemeAddict <lyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 6:46 AM, gleki <gleki.is...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>  
>> oh my. I even adore this chaos in lojbanists' views.
>> To tell you the truth I don't like lujvo and fu'ivla Type 3 at all.
>>
>> On Saturday, July 7, 2012 2:17:06 PM UTC+4, Lindar wrote:
>>>
>>> I suggest {granatu} from the linnean name "granatum".
>>
>>
>> Your suggestion looks naturalistic but as for biological taxonomy everyone
>> is right and everyone is wrong. Even biologists can't (and will never) come
>> to a conclusion what to name this or that organism.
>>
>> I think this is the only part of Lojban where we should "let usage
>> decide".
>> In all the other cases Lojban must be regulated.
>
>
> And how do you propose that the language be regulated?
>
> stevo
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Lojban Beginners" group.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/HZRI8YQ0P4MJ.
>>
>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Lojban Beginners" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

gleki

unread,
Jul 8, 2012, 4:11:35 AM7/8/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
Sorry to say but I have to support Lindar's {granatu} Type 4 fu'ivla.
Don't ask me for any logic in such decision cuz I said earlier there could be no logic in this field at all.

gleki

unread,
Jul 8, 2012, 4:15:43 AM7/8/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com


On Sunday, July 8, 2012 12:37:15 AM UTC+4, tsani wrote:
It might be so that taxonomists can't figure out what to call this
thing or that thing, but they will eventually come to some kind of
conclusion,
^ ^ ^
No. the only way to true classification is non-linear descriptions of anatomy, genomes etc. which no speakable language in the world is capable of.

not to mention that such disagreements probably have to do
with species that're so uncommon or bizarre
No. Sometimes they argue whether foxes belong to dogs or should have a distinct taxon changing it's Linnean name accrodingly.
It's stupid. Change you databases but don't change Linnean names to preserve ... "backward compatibility" (have those mad biologists ever heard about such thing as "backward compatibility"?) 
>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Lojban Beginners" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Jacob Errington

unread,
Jul 8, 2012, 5:03:19 AM7/8/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
Er, no? The rationale behind using -e and not -u is that the final
vowel from the fu'ivla head is -e and because in latin, the final
vowel is not really a true constituent of the *word*. The root itself
ends in a consonant, and therefore the final vowel has little real
bearing on the meaning, aside from grammatical implications. So no,
this isn't a malgli fu'ivla at all, especially considering that in
English, the word doesn't even end in a vowel (in speech, of course),
so "pomegranate" is lojbanised to {pamygranet} (probably, I'm no
expert on lojbanisation; I prefer to use real lojban words over
lojbanisations any day).

What'd be unjustifiably malglico would be {grutrpamagranete} and that
certainly isn't the case with {grutrgranate} which is justified in all
aspects.

mu'o mi'e la tsani

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Lojban Beginners" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/TX1byiv8jRMJ.

gleki

unread,
Jul 8, 2012, 5:27:25 AM7/8/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com


On Sunday, July 8, 2012 1:03:19 PM UTC+4, tsani wrote:
Er, no?

If you mean my "No", i was replying to this phrase "It might be so that taxonomists can't figure out what to call this 
thing or that thing, but they will eventually come to some kind of 
conclusion," only.
I can agree with the rest, though
> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

Jacob Errington

unread,
Jul 8, 2012, 11:18:42 AM7/8/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
Ah, gleki, I was pretty much only disagreeing with lindar. Assuming
"punica granatum" is the correct name, and that the thing is question
*is* a fruit, {grutrgranate} is the right type-3 for it.
>> > To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com.
>> > To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com.
>> > To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com.
>> > To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com.
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Lojban Beginners" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/D1gRf7b-jVMJ.
>
> To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com.

Pierre Abbat

unread,
Jul 8, 2012, 1:48:55 PM7/8/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
On Sunday, July 08, 2012 01:10:26 AM gleki wrote:
> Type 3 fu'ivla is not unnaturalistic at all. Ancient Egyptian (ju'ocu'i the
> eldest written language that we are aware of)
> actually had such type of words.
> e.g.
> [image: nfr][image: nfr][image: nfr][image: pr] pronounced as *nfrw *means
> "foundations of a house" where [image: pr] means house in order to
> distinguish it from other homophones pronounced as *nfrw* as well.
>
> It's like {grutrgranate} and {tricrgranate} in Lojban.

The Egyptian writing system has nothing to do with rafsi classifiers on
borrowed words. A better natlang example of a type-3 fu'ivla is "weeverfish"
(or "weaverfish"), where "weever" is from Old French and "fish" is native.

On Sunday, July 08, 2012 01:11:35 AM gleki wrote:
> Sorry to say but I have to support Lindar's {granatu} Type 4 fu'ivla.
> Don't ask me for any logic in such decision cuz I said earlier there could
> be no logic in this field at all.

It could be "granatu" or "granato" in my opinion, but I prefer both of them to
"granate", which is the vocative, which was lost.

Another possibility is "rimbone" or "rumbona", from Semitic, with "b" thrown
in for the morphology.

Pierre
--
li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa

Jonathan Jones

unread,
Jul 8, 2012, 2:10:36 PM7/8/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
Personally, being one of those people who hates fu'ivla of any kind, I like {tsiplise}, myself.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.




--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

gleki

unread,
Jul 9, 2012, 1:32:34 AM7/9/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com


On Sunday, July 8, 2012 10:10:36 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
Personally, being one of those people who hates fu'ivla of any kind, I like {tsiplise}, myself.

(facepalm) 
I like this word too. Should I create a third version of this pixra?

To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.

Jonathan Jones

unread,
Jul 9, 2012, 2:05:56 AM7/9/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
Should? I can't answer that. Do it if you want to.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/SGgSkFT9VIcJ.

To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.

gleki

unread,
Jul 9, 2012, 2:33:10 AM7/9/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
It just reminds me of tatoeba where many lojbanic sentences have 2-3 versions like jbobau/banjubu'o/la .lojban.
Flexibility and synonymy is great but sometimes we need to choose one way not to be misunderstood by others.

Jonathan Jones

unread,
Jul 9, 2012, 2:42:25 AM7/9/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
That's not a Lojban specific thing. Every language has that.

For example, you can call a person attractive, pretty, beautiful, handsome, sexy, cute, hot,...

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/Zkn6EUXdGYAJ.

To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.

Paul Predkiewicz

unread,
Jul 9, 2012, 6:43:16 AM7/9/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
I think {tsiplise} is awesome. Allthough it's pulp really is more like
from a berry, but since on the outside it looks like an apple, one
might consider {tsijbaplise}

Or, you could even put the phoenecians into the game, "who were active
in broadening its cultivation, partly for religious reasons." as
wikipedia puts it.

just my 2 one-hundredth subdivisions of several units of currency...
>>>>>> lojban-b...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>> lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>>>>>
>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/SGgSkFT9VIcJ.
>>>>
>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>>>
>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Lojban Beginners" group.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/Zkn6EUXdGYAJ.
>>
>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
> --
> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>
> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Lojban Beginners" group.

Jonathan Jones

unread,
Jul 9, 2012, 10:07:15 AM7/9/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
I got {tsiplise} by looking up the etymology of "pomegranate", which is "seeded apple". Adding more bits just makes the word more complicated.

gleki

unread,
Jul 9, 2012, 11:12:44 AM7/9/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com


On Monday, July 9, 2012 6:07:15 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
I got {tsiplise} by looking up the etymology of "pomegranate", which is "seeded apple". Adding more bits just makes the word more complicated.
It does. That's why I like it. But it's malglico if we copy the structure of zo'oi pomegranate
And that's might be a drawback.
Pomegranates have no relation to apples. 


>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>>>>>
>>>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
>>>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/SGgSkFT9VIcJ.
>>>>
>>>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.

>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>>>
>>> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
>>> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Lojban Beginners" group.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/Zkn6EUXdGYAJ.
>>
>> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.

>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
> --
> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>
> .i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
> (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Lojban Beginners" group.
> To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.

> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.

Jonathan Jones

unread,
Jul 9, 2012, 11:24:27 AM7/9/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
I wouldn't say "no relation". They're both fruit. :)

And it's not maglico to translate a name that in nearly every language is derived from it's LATIN name.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lojban-beginners/-/L6NRHvKjVWsJ.

To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.

Jonathan Jones

unread,
Jul 9, 2012, 11:28:26 AM7/9/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
Also, it doesn't matter how much kinship pomegranates and apples share, for the same reason it doesn't matter that lo latcribe is neither bear nor cat. Descriptive metaphors are to'e forbidden in Lojban.

gleki

unread,
Jul 9, 2012, 12:02:13 PM7/9/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com


On Monday, July 9, 2012 7:28:26 PM UTC+4, aionys wrote:
Also, it doesn't matter how much kinship pomegranates and apples share, for the same reason it doesn't matter that lo latcribe is neither bear nor cat. Descriptive metaphors are to'e forbidden in Lojban.
True. So we have
fu'ivla Type 3  - 1 vote (la tsani).
fu'ivla Type 4  - 1.5 votes (la .lindar. + 1/2 la gleki zo'o)
lujvo              - 1.5 votes  (la .aionys. + 1/2 la gleki)

We had no voices for experimental gismu (Save endangered Free gismu space! it's becoming too small) and cmene (but it's obvious).

I believe for every proposal for plants and animals we'll have the same distribution of voices.
We've got a good poll actually.



To post to this group, send email to lojban-beginners@googlegroups.com.

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginners+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.



--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.e'ucai ko cmima lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi.luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D )

.arpis.

unread,
Jul 9, 2012, 1:35:55 PM7/9/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Jonathan Jones <eye...@gmail.com> wrote:
I wouldn't say "no relation". They're both fruit. :)

And it's not maglico to translate a name that in nearly every language is derived from it's LATIN name.

Notable exceptions (notable in that I have some familiarity with them and bothered to look them up on wiktionary) seem to include Hebrew and seemingly (but I can't be sure) three Asiatic languages (Japanese, Chinese, and Korean).



--
mu'o mi'e .arpis.

Jonathan Jones

unread,
Jul 9, 2012, 2:05:13 PM7/9/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:35 AM, .arpis. <rpglover...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Jonathan Jones <eye...@gmail.com> wrote:
I wouldn't say "no relation". They're both fruit. :)

And it's not maglico to translate a name that in nearly every language is derived from it's LATIN name.

Notable exceptions (notable in that I have some familiarity with them and bothered to look them up on wiktionary) seem to include Hebrew and seemingly (but I can't be sure) three Asiatic languages (Japanese, Chinese, and Korean).

My point was that it's not malglico because it's not glico, regardless of whether it's mabla.

 

.arpis.

unread,
Jul 9, 2012, 3:25:35 PM7/9/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
Point taken.

Pierre Abbat

unread,
Jul 10, 2012, 2:02:07 AM7/10/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
On Monday, July 09, 2012 09:28:26 AM Jonathan Jones wrote:
> Also, it doesn't matter how much kinship pomegranates and apples share, for
> the same reason it doesn't matter that lo latcribe is neither bear nor cat.
> Descriptive metaphors are to'e forbidden in Lojban.

lo latcribe be la barda ku ja'a cribe .iku'i lo latcribe be la cmalu cu se
steci lo ka lazyjutsi pamei

On Monday, July 09, 2012 12:43:16 PM Paul Predkiewicz wrote:
> Or, you could even put the phoenecians into the game, "who were active
> in broadening its cultivation, partly for religious reasons." as
> wikipedia puts it.

The Phoenicians being active in broadening its cultivation is an argument for
calling it "rimbone", as Phoenician was closely related to Hebrew. Or should
it be "rimbonu"?

Pierre
--
sei do'anai mi'a djuno puze'e noroi nalselganse srera

Jonathan Jones

unread,
Jul 10, 2012, 2:29:28 AM7/10/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Pierre Abbat <ph...@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
On Monday, July 09, 2012 09:28:26 AM Jonathan Jones wrote:
> Also, it doesn't matter how much kinship pomegranates and apples share, for
> the same reason it doesn't matter that lo latcribe is neither bear nor cat.
> Descriptive metaphors are to'e forbidden in Lojban.

lo latcribe be la barda ku ja'a cribe .iku'i lo latcribe be la cmalu cu se
steci lo ka lazyjutsi pamei

Yes, I know. The Red Panda is cousin of the racoon. I should've realized that latcribe referred to Giant Panda as well.
 
On Monday, July 09, 2012 12:43:16 PM Paul Predkiewicz wrote:
> Or, you could even put the phoenecians into the game, "who were active
> in broadening its cultivation, partly for religious reasons." as
> wikipedia puts it.

The Phoenicians being active in broadening its cultivation is an argument for
calling it "rimbone", as Phoenician was closely related to Hebrew. Or should
it be "rimbonu"?

Pierre
--
sei do'anai mi'a djuno puze'e noroi nalselganse srera
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lojban Beginners" group.
To post to this group, send email to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to lojban-beginne...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lojban-beginners?hl=en.

Michael Turniansky

unread,
Aug 22, 2012, 9:18:25 AM8/22/12
to lojban-b...@googlegroups.com
  Except that interposing an arbitrary consonant for the purposes of lojbanization would destroy the triliteral root, and make it look like it comes from "r-m-b", which is non-existent (at least in Hebrew).  So in this case I'd prefer to not use the Semitic.

  --gejyspa

P.S. Put me down for preferring type-3 fu'ivla over type 4 (but in this case, I wouldn't mind either one, and like the lujvo best).

      

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages