Worked great in multiple areas I tested (Los Angeles, New York, DC).
Unfortunately, Google Transit has not integrated it into their
results--when routing a public transit trip, it still shows a curved
arrow that does not follow any streets, even though you can also get
walking directions between those locations. I hope this gets changed soon!
It is good to see realistic walk routes being offered now ... although it
then makes the projection of a location onto the nearest road link a key
factor in whether the route is actually correct or not (and this is not
something over which we can have any influence, of course). I think we have
to bear this in mind - I presume that you take the objective coordinates for
a selected location (address or whatever) - and project from those
coordinates to the nearest link on the network, at right angles to that
link. Is that how this is being done?
What this development also does for systems which rely only on the
coordinates of stops to illustrate the on-bus routes is to portray the walk
route along road links ... but then project the bus journey by straight
lines between the bus stops. Do you have any plans to apply the same
routing technique used for the walk links to the bus links between each pair
of stops ... thereby obviating the need for shape files to get a realistic
route projection onto the road network?
Best wishes
Roger
Traveline south east UK
Yes, to calculate walking directions, you need to find the most
convenient points on the walking graph to the start and end of the
walking segment, and go from there. Right now the walking graph is
very similar to the road network, but I expect that they will diverge
more over time as more information about pedestrian-only paths is
added and other improvements are made.
> What this development also does for systems which rely only on the
> coordinates of stops to illustrate the on-bus routes is to portray the walk
> route along road links ... but then project the bus journey by straight
> lines between the bus stops. Do you have any plans to apply the same
> routing technique used for the walk links to the bus links between each pair
> of stops ... thereby obviating the need for shape files to get a realistic
> route projection onto the road network?
As always, I can't comment on future plans. I think it would be
unfortunate to do away with the operator-provided shapes completely,
as they're useful to non-Google consumers of transport data.
Joe
Thanks. I am not proposing to abandon shape files for those systems that
want to generate them .... but for systems whose own data is used to create
mapped routes on the fly, there is never any justification to create the
mass of data necessary to make shape files. You will appreciate that I
speak for a data supplier with several thousand routes covering a very large
geographical area. So for us, mapping routes by linking stops by the
shortest available road route is "normal" - and the lack of that option on
Google is a disadvantage in terms of how itineraries are presented on the
Google interface compared with how they are presented on our own web site at
www.travelinesoutheast.org.uk
Best wishes
Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: google...@googlegroups.com [mailto:google...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Joe Hughes
Sent: 24 July 2008 02:05
To: google...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Walking Directions in Google Maps
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Transit Trip Planner" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/googletransit/-/nXU7x4msK4gJ.
To post to this group, send email to google...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to googletransi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/googletransit?hl=en.